Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

The drivers power window mechanism in my Cefiro went yesterday & I’m having a few problems finding a new one. In the parts list it says that the 4 door R32 mechanism fits but after going to Nizzpro today that apparently isn’t true. The one out of my Ceffy is a cable & slide sort of system (see pic) & apparently the R32 4 door is a scissor style. If anybody has a 4 door R32 can you please have a look & see what style you have got, or maybe any Silvia or 180 owners can do the same.

I’m located just south of the NSW border & I can’t find a Ceffy one, I’ve tried Rollins & Nizzpro but no luck, I also tried to contact RMA Imports but the number listed put me through to some Asian woman that could hardly speak English. If anyone can let me know of anywhere that would be likely to have Ceffy bits, that would be appreciated as they can be quite a pain in the arse to find at times.

post-68055-1288417286_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/342414-power-window-help/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

like ^^ said , r33 4d look very close to that (also 2 door look very similar , but i've never compared side by side) . next place to look as silly as it sounds , try au/ba look very similar also . if the cable is ok you can pull the motor apart and replace that too , try jay car or places like that for a motor

my drivers reg did the same thing and closest replacement I could find was u13 bluebird, I used the cefiros rail and window bracket, and fitted the bluebird motor and cable to it, the motor is very similar and the cable is a similar length, but I had to do a mod to the cable stoppers (add some length to it) yea, really really difficult to explain, so I won't get into it, but if you do this the mod that needs to be done will be evident

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...