Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Laggy unbalanced bush bearing copy, (I have one here). It would be better to chuck in another few hundred and buy a good secondhand Garrett one from the for sale section, there have been a few in there recently.

Surely they are balanced, if not it would grenade after a few minutes of running, they just use oldschool crappy bearings that is the only issue.

Sure they are often poor wheel combinations making them laggy etc but I don't really know why they wouldn't last, just might get poor quality housings making them flow less than optimally.

Edited by Rolls
Surely they are balanced, if not it would grenade after a few minutes of running, they just use oldschool crappy bearings that is the only issue.

Sure they are often poor wheel combinations making them laggy etc but I don't really know why they wouldn't last, just might get poor quality housings making them flow less than optimally.

Few reasons I found when I was dealing with those 4 years ago:

1. Materials on the turbine wheel is not 100%

2. Balancing machine used overseas is a "overseas brand" or needs calibration.

3. Not all of them are VSRed (some just put 2x poorly balanced wheels together).

4. Shaft tolerance is too high

5. Some of the Ring groves and retainer groves are not deep enough

6. Some of the bearing housing castings were not up to standard.

7. Oil rings were not treated in the right way, Garrett once are lot harder and lot harder to snap.

8. Housing profile is not all 100%, Some of them were profiled out centered and angled.

9. Very roughly built. Some of them even had piston rings crushed out side the bearing housing.

10. Builder has very little knowledge about the product. So the combination is not optimized for the best out come.

All the works seems like very roughly done and slapped together. I’ve been told by one of the manufactures that one of their experienced worker can produce 20 turbos from casting in a day. I have 2x experienced engineers whom can only produce 6 turbos a day from casting.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...