Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now I understand the principle fairly well of surge slots, I am also aware that they do in fact work so it is my understanding that is lacking.

From what I understand they basically leak air back out the compressor into the intake, so under high pressure (surge) instead of the blades skipping on the air as the engine cannot ingest anymore air, it just flows back into the intake much like a recirc bov. Now at low rpm when surge happens this makes perfect sense and I can see how it works, however my question is at higher rpm when the engine is well out of the surge zone and it can in fact ingest all the air, what stops the air from being leaked out the holes back into the intake again?

The intake (pre turbo) is ALWAYS under vacuum so the path of least resistance is always going to be to go back out the surge slots, what stops it happening at higher rpm and basically just wasting half the compressors flow? Is it because at high rpm the surge holes can only flow so much air so a static amount of air is wasted (recirculated) at all rpms or is there something more fancy going on? Also how much flow do they waste at high rpm, is it a tiny amount, or does it visually change the flow map of the turbocharger?

Look forward to see if anyone can explain it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348757-someone-explain-surge-slots-to-me/
Share on other sites

disco explained it very well not that long ago, but since this new forum version i can never find anything relevant with the search function, its useless.

edit: found it without search

No its more of a pressure balance thing . What happens is the leading edges of the lower or splitter blades are just inside or below where the radial slot is located . When the pressure is higher in front of the splitter blades the full height blades bypass some air out through the slot purely because its the lower pressure or least path of resistance . At higher revs the engine can swallow more air so the pressure in front of the splitter blades decreases so the air previously being bypassed goes through the housing to the engine .

The whole idea of port shrouded comp housings is to allow a larger compressor wheel or wheel trim to be used while avoiding compressor surge .

The other thing is that it allows smaller A/R turbine housings so be used on biggish turbos and avoid compressor surge issues .

A good example of a turbo most know of is the Garrett/HKS GT3076R/GT3037 56 trim . Turbine housings from HKS alone start a 0.61 A/R and go up to from memory 1.12 and Garrett's range from 0.63 to 1.06 A/R . I reckon you'd have a hard time avoiding surge with the 0.61 or the 0.63 housings given that the compressor is good for 500+ horsepower , people who've use both those housing never mention comp surge so the PS'd housings do work .

A .

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/342457-hks2835-tune/page__st__100

Edited by JonnoHR31

The funny thing is that post was actually a reply to my question! however I still don't quite follow the exact details of what is going on, I don't get why it leaks air at low rpm stopping surge but doesn't leak more air at high rpm essentially wasting the compressors flow.

I dont get why there is only a pressure difference there during surge, there is always going to be a pressure difference, eg the intake is always under vacuum and the blades are always under pressure, so there will always be a large pressure difference, it will be even larger during surge so I guess more will flow out of them at this time, but why don't they continue to leak flow at higher rpm?

yer but during surge some of the air starts flowing backwards. from this pic it looks like the surge slots bleed air from halfway along the blade, so under normal conditions that area woulnt be under boost, it'd still be in vacuum. but in surge the backwards flowing air can go through these slots.

Fig2_enlarges.gif

ah ok, that pic makes it more obvious, I can see how it normally would be under vacuum at that point, but when surge occurs it be earlier in the blade, I assumed the surge slots went directly to the blade and there wasn't a right angle like in that pic.

ty

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...