Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , I'm having a few starting issues with my 33 and I doubt its the battery . It now has to be connected to my CTek charger so that it WILL start when I want it too .

Recently got home after half an hours drive and the cow wouldn't start after I'd shut it down to open the garage door . From cold it fires up quite willingly off the charger but not so well having stood around after a reasonable run out somewhere . When I get it home its back on the charger which claims its around 3/4 charged .

I reckon I need an alternator and I usually have higher output ones than std fitted to my cars if they need changing .

I think I remember reading that some Maxima's had 100 or 120 amp output alternators on them where R33s tend to be 80 or 90 and can be Hitachi or Mitsubishi .

Anyone had a win with a higher output Japanese alternator on an R33 RB25 powered car ?

Cheers , Adrian .

unless your using lots of electrical power then a bigger alternator prob wont help. could be a few things... something draining the battery and the charger is compensating. will it start if you use the charger then dont try to start it for a while?

the battery may be at fault and the charger is keeping a surface charge in. what is the charge rate? should be 13.8- 14.4 ideally. but as log as its above 13 it should be enough if all other components are in good working order. i would be checking voltage 30 mins after its been running then check again in the morning and see how far it has dropped. if it has still 12+ in the morning check voltage while cranking and it shouldnt go below 10v

  • 1 year later...

I may have had a win with this . I stumbled across a 95 A32 Maxima (VQ30DE) in a wrecker and surprise surprise it had a Hitachi LR1110-705 (110a) alternator on it . They take a bit of digging to remove , hate transverse V6 front wheel drives , but at least when you remove them yourself you get all the fasteners and plugs etc .

I'm not sure if it will be a direct fit to my GTS25T but I think it will be close enough to go in without too much of a fight . The cars ODO showed 196K and the badly cracked rad top tank is most likely what killed that car .

Myself and a mechanic friend freshened up a 2nd hand Z32 300ZX Hitachi alternator for the old Subaru and the upgrade from 50 to 80a output was good - no dim lights at idle . This Maxima alt owes me a whole $35 and the other one cost $50 and a pair of bearings . I'll get this one tested and if good we'll split it and replace its bearings - and brushes if required .

More later , cheers A .

BTW - be wary of old plastic top rad tanks because they can go without warning and damage engines easily . I say the top one because the hot side tanks are always the ones that cop the hottest coolant and generally die first .

I dont understand how an alternator will help your car start?

it will help charge a battery, but it doesnt aid in starting the car...

you need to ask why your battery charge is being brought down so quickly.

I dont understand how an alternator will help your car start?

it will help charge a battery, but it doesnt aid in starting the car...

you need to ask why your battery charge is being brought down so quickly.

Good call. OP should check what the alternator is putting out. If its in the usual 14-14.8 volt range, then turn everything off (ie remove key), pull earth off the battery and connect earth to the battery negative via a multimeter in current mode. This will tell you how much current is being pulled with everything off. IIRC mine was about 20 milliamps. If its a lot more than that, pull fuses one a time and see if the reading drops.

AFAIK VL alternators are 85 amp.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...