Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello guys

I havent been in a skyline in over 4 years now and have forgotten what its like.

Anyone have an r34 turbo, and can they recommend the car or any known issues that the model has?

Im looking into getting back into one as my daily driver

cheers

SAM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355471-wanting-to-get-back-into-a-skyline/
Share on other sites

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/35129-im-buying-a-skyline-what-should-i-look-for/

My R34 had rust on the boot just above the brake light. Apparently it's a very common problem.

Another one is the coilpacks.

+1 for coilpacks. Mine shat themselves just before the 100Km service - so be prepared for a big hit if the car you are looking at is coming up for its 100K (most these days are hard to come by with that little KM's anyway!)

I went from a 32 to an S15 then to my R34 - best decision i made coming back to the solid strong platform that is the 34 from the '15.

My rear cradle bushings (think thats what they are) went to gravy a while ago and i was getting some weird knocking noises from the back. If the bushes havent been replaced rather recently that may need doing.

Are you looking at manual or auto?

Another thing, if you smash up a 34 the parts are expensive and sometimes hard to get compared to 32's and 33's. I have been sent alot of 33 stuff when i specifically asked for 34 stuff, there is alot of differences between the 2. Other than that, I love my GT-T and it always turns heads. I've always been a fan of 2 door coupe's as its all about the power to weight ;)

I've always been a fan of 2 door coupe's as its all about the power to weight ;)

FWIW, the 4 door R34 is a grand total of 20kg heavier.. IMO thats a small price to pay for two extra doors and (Possibly?) less attention from the boys in blue

Not sure about the 34 coil packs, but when mine started sparking out majorly in my 33, i took them out and put a nice even layer of high heat silicone on all sides of them, havent been a problem since :thumbsup:

I test drove 2 gtt's today, both a black and grey one

fairly stock with only a few minor mods, which is what im after not a car thats a blue oval chaser .....

Anyone know the standard ride height of these cars?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...