Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey.

Looking to upgrade my fuel system, and my car has a returnless fuel system. My stock FPR in the tank is not up to the job of making anymore power.

I need a non-return, boost referenced FPR.

Would this work? Here on eBay

That aeromotive one has one inlet and three outlets, so in theory i should be able to use that in a returnless system right?

Like this:

fpr.jpg

Yeah? Any other models of FPR that would work? Basically I need something with an inlet, outlet AND a return.

Thanks.

Edited by turbo x-trail
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/357209-learn-me-on-returnless-fprs/
Share on other sites

Edit:

Why cant u run a return line?

The stock system is returnless, and there's no extra fitting on the end of the fuel rail to run a return back to the tank. And as far as I've seen, there's no aftermarket companies that make a return style fuel rail of good quality.

That will work fine - my pick would be a sard or nismo regulator. Stay well away from turbosmart.

Got to ask - whats wrong with whats already there? Have you run out of fuel pump?

Nah I've run out of FPR flow. The stock FPR in the tank isn't boost referenced and I'm guessing it's running out of flow and the pressure is dropping at around 13psi on this set-up. Max boost sees 76% duty cycle from the injectors, and I've got a genuine 500hp walbro in the tank. The only other link in the chain is the FPR, so logic says it isn't up to scratch.

Cant you run a new braided fuel line and use the stock one as the return Cam? What does the stock fuel pump setup look like?

Stock set-up is a pump, filter and FPR built into the fuel canister. Pump receives a constant 12V (have checked it), base fuel pressure is 3.5bar, and the line's size is 7.95mm (5/16th)...

p.s. thanks for replies fellas!

I would just braze a stainless dash fitting on the closed end of the rail and reverse the flow, run a referenced reg off the stock line in the engine bay, a new pump bracket and braided feed line and you are done.

A stainless plate for the tank with the fuel fittings, insulated connectors and pump hanging off it would be good, as im sure your pump assembly is plastic like mine right?

I would just braze a stainless dash fitting on the closed end of the rail and reverse the flow, run a referenced reg off the stock line in the engine bay, a new pump bracket and braided feed line and you are done.

A stainless plate for the tank with the fuel fittings, insulated connectors and pump hanging off it would be good, as im sure your pump assembly is plastic like mine right?

Woah that's a huuge job!

Wouldn't it be just as effective to run the FPR and utilize the stock line, like my amazing paint drawing described? I've heard the limit for a returnless system in the Sentras (same engine, car in the US) is about 400hp.

I'm nowhere near that at the moment. It should work returnless no problems. I wanna avoid going to a returnless system as much as possible, it would be a karnt of a job, and I can't justify doing all that work if i'm not planning anymore power down the track...

Dude, you just put a turbo in. How is a fuel line and reg too hard. :P

True hahah... Only problem is this car is my daily, so intake manifold off, fuel rail out, sending fuel rail off to be welded, running a return line down the back, tuning it all on the street etcc.. would take more than a weekend!

But from what I see, it'll work just the same return or returnless.

Scotty do ya reckon the aeromotive FPR I linked above would suit? I've found a good seller on eBay and a good price! From what I hear they make good gear, and it's got the right number of inlets/outlets...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...