Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Go and read my post.

Then read it again.

Then continue reading

The car is BUILD PLATED as TURBO.

- You cannot put a RB30E into a R32 and be legal if my recollection of laws is correct (I'm usually pretty on the money), meaning RB20E and RB25DE are your choices etc. You cannot put an older motor, into a newer chassis.

- You need to RE-ENGINEER it, that is not free to begin with. They might also emissions test you, again not free.

It's not a simple case of "motor out, motor in - I've beaten the system".

It might pay you to investigate the laws before getting wild ideas.

i work in the industry and know an engineer, i can get most things done cheap.

like ive said its still just an idea its not a solid plan as of yet. im still trying to sell the car. this is only an idea for if the car doesnt sell and i decide to keep it

Was that the only civil war? You didn't specify

Next thing you will claim your horses actually made 1.5hp

I didn't specify, just saying that there were no tanks in the Civil War re enactments that I take part in.

As far as horses making 1.5 HP it is very possible. I mean we all know horses have power-bands, like any engine. You know how when you ride a horse and when you squeeze your boots into it and it goes from a trot to a canter to a sprint and you feel the increase in torque, they called that the "boots" but somewhere along the line it was misread as "boost", so the term boost that we all know so well actually comes from the good old days when we all used horses to get around.

Anyway, back to the HP discussion. Unlike today, when you had your horse dynoed (attached to a rope which went through a sheave 90 degrees to a load hanging vertical) they used an average power figure as opposed to a peak power figure we use today. So to say a horse has 1 HP is just an average figure, in fact many horses had anywhere up to 1.8HP peak power.

Edited by robincooper

yeah im aware of that, its not my biggest worry

Well it should be because you might as well leave the RB20DET in there. You are illegal regardless.

At least when you get defected, realise it was a dumb idea to buy the turbo...

You'll actually be able to sell it. As opposed to with a RB30E, illegal motor, car is now not worth a cent.

Well it should be because you might as well leave the RB20DET in there. You are illegal regardless.

At least when you get defected, realise it was a dumb idea to buy the turbo...

You'll actually be able to sell it. As opposed to with a RB30E, illegal motor, car is now not worth a cent.

if i put an n/a motor in the car the plan will be to keep it! so im not worried about the value. why be so f**king hostile for

I dont think he understands the english :(

use your f**king head. its a completely different kind of illegal, if i get caught driving turbo i instantly lose my licence. if i get caught driving a car with an illegal motor in it they defect the car, i keep my licence.. which one would u rather!!???

i work in the industry and know an engineer, i can get most things done cheap.

like ive said its still just an idea its not a solid plan as of yet. im still trying to sell the car. this is only an idea for if the car doesnt sell and i decide to keep it

If you drag your engineer into it and he writes a blue plate for a car that is not legally allowed to be blue plated, he will lose his licence. And he will be aware of this....and not write the plate, therefore you won't be able to get it engineered and when you get pulled over, instead of being fined for driving a turbo car on your P's, you'll have the car removed from the road permanently and get a fine for driving an illegally modified car.

Something to consider if you are thinking of doing it still

if i put an n/a motor in the car the plan will be to keep it! so im not worried about the value. why be so f**king hostile for

Because you see unable to comprehend basic logic?

Let me try, once more - to help you out.

RB20DET - Illegal

RB30E - Illegal

Why f**k around, putting a RB30E into the R32 if its illegal?

It's time, effort, money - and you are no better off. You have a car that is worth less, is slower and is in no way anymore "legal"

Tell me you speaka da englese ?

use your f**king head. its a completely different kind of illegal, if i get caught driving turbo i instantly lose my licence. if i get caught driving a car with an illegal motor in it they defect the car, i keep my licence.. which one would u rather!!???

I'd rather buy a VL and be done with it

use your f**king head. its a completely different kind of illegal, if i get caught driving turbo i instantly lose my licence. if i get caught driving a car with an illegal motor in it they defect the car, i keep my licence.. which one would u rather!!???

The car is build plated as turbo

If you really do "work in the industry", you'd realise that regardless of what motor - all the officer has to do is look at the REGO STICKER.

It's a TURBO VEHICLE regardless of whether there is actually a turbo in the engine bay. The Police don't care.

You could take it to court, then try explain why you have a illegal motor in the car.

I bet that'll go down brilliantly, so make sure you let me know if it does. I'll fly up just to sit there and listen in.

both you guys are f**ked i swear to god if yous wanna be f**kwits gimme a call and lets have a chat you obviously arent listening to a thing im even trying to say.

0415477089, justin.

Oh piss off you stupid child. :domokun:

Enough outta you.

We've offered advice, comments and thoughts - you've paid no attention to them. Go back to your industry.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...