Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey well,

Well just for inspection purposes I pulled out the plug from cylinder one. Looks pretty good to me but just wondering if it could be a tad on the lean side as it looks a little too clean. Plugs are more than 6000km old.

My main concern was detonation issues(my other ecu was reading crap load of ping at times, shit tune). Car has been on stock ecu for a fair while, only had the other one in there for a day.

Any input would be great.

These are copper plugs so I'll be changing these with the same ones on next oil change.

Cheers guys

post-68383-0-09983600-1302315098_thumb.jpg

post-68383-0-58793600-1302315152_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360290-how-does-my-spark-plug-look/
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well lets bump this up just for comparison purposes. I recently had a few things put on my car(see the rb25 dyno thread). I put this stuff on the car and it was about a month or two before I got it all tuned. Before the tune I pulled the plugs and oil and what not to ensure everything went in fresh. The plugs came out looking just like above, nice and normal.

Anyway got the car back and the problems started. I put the exact same model plugs in, gapped appropriately. 2 of 6 failed after 300km. Look at them now. I just put a brand new set in there because of the misfires and shit that the car has been giving me.

I have no doubt in my mind that this tune is pouring fuel into my engine... I'm going to take it back and I expect not to pay anything more to have it looked at because this is a joke. I'll be chewing through spark plugs everytime I go to fill up a tank of fuel by the looks of it. I'm not impressed at all really and I kind of feel sick to the stomach. I thought I made the right choice in tuner but clearly the tune shows otherwise.

And to note, when the two plugs failed, I replaced them temporarily with the old plugs up in the OP. The picture you see if the old plug up in my original post, it was driven on for about 20km.

post-68383-0-46908000-1310275805_thumb.jpg

post-68383-0-16330800-1310275840_thumb.jpg

post-68383-0-45799900-1310275874_thumb.jpg

ok so others don't have to go looking for mods because you were too lazy to post them i have quoted your post from the dyno section.

you say that the pump was failing during the tune and that you fitted another pump. was that done after the dyno runs? if yes that that is your problem and your fault and not the tuners. your tune was done with a failing pump and you have gone and fitted a working pump which will now be supplying much more fuel (higher pressure) so the injectors will be pumping in extra fuel.

Got my car tuned but its going back soon.

Anyway its an R33 GTST Series 2 with the following:

Unopened RB25DET

HyperGear ATR43SS-2

3" JJR Bellmouth dump

HKS Hi Power Silent exhaust

Yellow jacket coils

NGK Copper plugs BCP7RES gapped to .7

Genuine HDI FMIC

Venom 5" body 100cpsi cat

Nismo 740cc injectors

Bosch 040(was failing during tune)

Nismo FPR

Greddy profec b spec 2

3" metal intake with Apexi power intake filter

Power FC tuned by Advan performance

Made 244rwkw on 11.4psi. That is with the boost controller set to 100%. That is as much as we can get out of it. With about 15psi, we should see about 270rwkw and 17psi about 280rwkw. 20psi should see 300rwkw on regular fuel pump.

Ive fitted a GTR fuel pump in there to fix the fuel pump issues. Probably will swap that with a brand new 040 pump or run it as a lift into a surge tank. Last printed dyno shows about 238rwkw on 11psi, should have printed the previous runs :P

ok so others don't have to go looking for mods because you were too lazy to post them i have quoted your post from the dyno section.

you say that the pump was failing during the tune and that you fitted another pump. was that done after the dyno runs? if yes that that is your problem and your fault and not the tuners. your tune was done with a failing pump and you have gone and fitted a working pump which will now be supplying much more fuel (higher pressure) so the injectors will be pumping in extra fuel.

When I took the car to the tuner I had no problems with the car. The tuner said it will take him about a day to set everything up and test everything on the car before he tunes. He had to install my new injectors and setup the fuel pressure on the regulator, he asked me what fuel pump I had and I said a 040 and he said ok its all setup correctly to be run in on the dyno. When he was about to start the tune(I was not there at this time) he said the AFR looked strange at low RPM. He said it may be due to surging of the turbo at low RPM and that is nothing to worry about. After the tune was complete he said he is happy with the power it made at the set boost but said it can do with more boost. I took it home the next day and the pump failed. I did not know. He said the fuel pressure was good. The pump was priming. If the pump was failing he should have picked up on it. That is like saying one of my piston rings is worn and I didn't tell him. I payed him $800 to check my cars health and do a tune. He made me pay him to regap my plugs. He made me pay him to fix my PCV valve. He made me pay him to test my fuel. Its a f**king joke that anyone would think its my fault. How was I to know? I drove this car for 8 months without a single fuel related issue. The only real issue was my coils failing on me which I fixed my self. It was only after I told him the pump failed AFTER the tune that he did suspect the pump was failing during the tune.

When you go to a mechanic to fix a problem on your car, its up to them to find the problem based on your input. I told him what the car had, that it was fine. He ran the car on the dyno and say the poor AFR. He could have told me that he suspected the pump is going or it felt lazy rather than continue tuning and take my money.

Another guy on here had his car tuned, payed for it, took it home and it was running rich as shit. He then realized he had something unplugged(which he unplugged him self). He took it back to the tuner and the tuner fixed up the fuel map for free even though this was the car owners fault. I hope for my sake that this tuner will not take me for more money.

Edited by SargeRX8

the pump may have been failing by a small enough amount to not seem too bad (lets say 25% down) since all he has to work off is injector rates and every car will run different injector rates with similar mods. once tuned at that rate if a fully operational fuel pump put in it will run rich as hell (since it has just started adding in 25% more fuel). that is not the tuners fault in my opinion.

as for your tuner charging you to do work, that isn't that unreasonable is it? they are doing work, why shouldn't they get paid for it. if it doesn't solve the problem then they can't be blamed for that if they honestly thought it was going to help. often with car problems there can be many different causes so you just have to go through each possibility until it is fixed. sometimes you might get it first go, other times it might take you a day of mucking around. some people will be kind enough to fix stuff for free, especially if it doesn't take them much time to fix or they made a reasonable amount of money off the initial work.

the fact remains though, new pump is the cause of the running rich. had the pump continued working for a year then the tune would've been fine. it essentially is no different to a tune being out because a bigger turbo was fitted.

Do you think the fix could be as simple as adjusting the fuel pressure? If the pressure is set to 43%, how much impact would a fully operational pump have on pressure?

I can understand what you are saying but if I have to pay again for a tune and be out of the car for a week, its about harsh on me, isn't it? I'll be going there tomorrow showing them the plugs and seeing what can be done.

it could be a case of simply dropping the fuel pressure, however it will come down to whether it is rich all over the tune or just up high (which is most likely since the fuel required at low load is bugger all so even a dying pump shouldn't be leaning out at idle). my guess is that only the upper end of the tune will need to be altered and even this shouldn't require too much work, depending on whether they tune with the hand controller or with pc software

and yes i agree with the fact that it isn't really fair if you have to pay for a second tune.

Hey Sarge i hav to agree 110% with everything mad082 has said about the fuel pump and mechanics in general. Its a process of trial and error in alot of cases. Also agree with him in saying about the fuel pump throwing the tune. But i also know exactly how u feel about paying again.

Im sure if u ask NICELY that advan will help u out in rechecking/setting the AFR's across the board.

Just be sure to be friendly. Don't accuse them and get them off gaurd.

Let us know how u go today.

As polite and kind as I could be, he wants a couple hundred and the whole day to adjust the fuel pressure and tidy the tune on dyno... Is this right?

time frame wise it seems reasonable since i'm guessing that just dropping the pressure won't be enough since you still have to maintain a certain amount of pressure, so a lot of it will be redoing the actual tune. money wise i'd compare how much he wants to how much it cost for the initial tune. if it is much lower then i'd say it's reasonable. if it's clsoe to the same cost then possibly not

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...