Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im planning to do an engine coversion, R33 rb26dett engine with rb25det gear box into a s14 200sx.

Im planning to do the conversion myself, is there anything you guys think i should know?

Has anyone done this conversion?

Which engine cross member could i use or do i have to get it fabricated?

And also same question as above for the gear box cross member?

Does the gear box bolt straight up?

Thank for the help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/
Share on other sites

Hi Sooky, try the Silvia forums, this stuff is done and talked about all the time there.

From what I have seen you use a Cefiro front cross member as they are a Slivia platform that came standard with an RB20. So the cross member is designed to fit a RB into that chassis. The SR20 gearbox doesn't bolt up and it wouldn't handle the torque anyway. The conversions I have seen use an RB25DET (as in R33 GTST) gearbox with a spacer to bolt up the standard rear (gearbox) cross member.

Hope that points you in the right direction.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-721260
Share on other sites

thanks for the replys,

so i can use the rb25 gearbox mount with rb25 gearbox cool.

then seems the only major part to get fabricated will be the driveshaft

http://www.mckinneymotorsports.com/sale.php

this is one of the company in the US. thta had made a motor month kit for the car. i am unsure if this would work for you. but it has customdrive shaft to fit and everything.

do you guys have a KA engine or a ca18 or sr20??

cause we used the crossmember for the KA engine with the swap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-721878
Share on other sites

I am going to be swapping in a Rb25DET into my S14 and McKinney seems to be the only one right now who has a RB26 mount kit. Their kit lets you keep both turbos.  

Get the driveshaft custom made at a local shop. The KA X-member should be fine if you get their mounts.

there are a few other. i am waiting to hear about then before i think about using them if i do a similar swap.

now i am wondering if austria ues a KA similar cross member if they aren't. then this kit would be useless.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-721947
Share on other sites

R32 crossmember

Modify the gearbox crossmember

Modify the tunnel to fit the g/box as it is much chunkier than the SR box

modified tailshaft

plus some more little things once you actually get it in there.

I hope you know what you are doing when it comes to cars and have alot of $$$ & time if you want to do it properly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-724617
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I have no idea why people do this conversion. By the time you stick an RB into an S14 instead of the SR20DET it weighs more than an R32 GTST. I have weighed a couple and they came in over 1350 kgs, our R32 GTST with an RB31DET weighs 1245 kgs. Even an S13 is really not worth the effort.

In the US where they don't have SR20DET's I can understand it, but in Oz and NZ it baffles me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-725340
Share on other sites

Its called someone who wants copious amounts of power.. think about it, you go and spend your $30k on a bullet proof SR20DET, effectively your pushing it pretty hard to make 400rwkw and i dont care who has tuned it, you still have a time bomb on your hands. first car that coes to mind is DVLISH..... It either blows up or its only a matter of time before it get tired and needs a rebuild....

so instead you throw your $30k at an RB26 build and effectively have the pottential for 330rwkw with bolt ons...... ad some forgies, a nice set of rods and should have closer to 400rwkw. Take it to the next step and the possibilities are endless.

Now before you go telling me that the power as to be gotten to the ground, yes i already know this. Anyone that has been crazy enough to throw $25k at an RB26 S14 is not silly enough to leave standard suspension or the standard braking system..... its going to take some time and effort to sort it out but its time and effort that gets people the numbers in the end.

As for weight....i think the extra 100kgs will benefit the car in the long run anyway. According to the weigh bridge, my S14a weighed in at 1260 with half a tank of fuel and a stereo when the SR was fitted. Most of the weight added is in the gearbox anyway and its more central than front heavy. Doing these things right takes time, and time i have so its going to be quite interesting to see how she goes when back on the road.

can i ask how many RB26 S14's you have weighed Sydneykid??? as i know of no other S14 with an RB so far and am interested to see who else has done this conversion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-725786
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I have no idea why people do this conversion.  By the time you stick an RB into an S14 instead of the SR20DET it weighs more than an R32 GTST.  I have weighed a couple and they came in over 1350 kgs, our R32 GTST with an RB31DET weighs 1245 kgs.  Even an S13 is really not worth the effort.

In the US where they don't have SR20DET's I can understand it, but in Oz and NZ it baffles me.

Because Sr's are crap :rofl:

PHaT MR30, pics of your conversion please.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36081-rb26-s14/#findComment-726734
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...