Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive just fitted a new fuel pump and need to tune the fuel curves as theyre rich as hell and all over the place

what would be a better option, the SAFC or a remap?

given i will be modding the car a bit in the future....

im running a bosch 910 pump and a garrett T04E with ex gate + all other normal mods (zorst, pod etc)

thanks!

adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3642-safc-or-remapped-ecu/
Share on other sites

Does diconnecting the battery reset the SAFC as well as the ECU?

no you can even remove the s-afc and it will keep teh same settings

some things to consider when using an s-afc you will need a boost cut defendeer if you plan to run more than 12 psi and timing changes could help you get more power.

. If your aiming for 160-70 rwkw then s-afc is fine 200 + then look at the power fc

meggala

No need for PowerFC for me, I'm not aiming for 200+ at all. I dont often drive that hard so it makes no sense!

I think 170 - 180rwkw is my target.

OK, if the settings are permanent, then I'm happy with that. Only thing is I'd like to have it in an inconspicuous position where it's well hidden! I dont want theives breaking my windows, and cops breaking my balls!

Originally posted by Zahos

No need for PowerFC for me, I'm not aiming for 200+ at all. I dont often drive that hard so it makes no sense!

I think 170 - 180rwkw is my target.

OK, if the settings are permanent, then I'm happy with that. Only thing is I'd like to have it in an inconspicuous position where it's well hidden! I dont want theives breaking my windows, and cops breaking my balls!

the e-manage is discrete, and for $450 is cheaper than the S-AFC with the options of upgrading it.

Originally posted by meggala

rev 210 tell me where I can by a emange with harness software sensores etc for 450 brand new.

meggala

nengun flogs the e-manage for $450AUS. The harness and software are extra, but I thought this guy just wants the functions of the S-AFC. If so the e-manage in its $450 form does the same thing. Anyway you can buy the E-01 boost controller later on and do away with the need for the harness and software.

Originally posted by Zahos

Even if you wanted to use it in the same fashion as an AFC, wouldn't you still need the software to tune it?

thats only another 250 from here in australia... which makes the total 665 which is about what it is just to buy the e-manage unit itself... u do the math :D

Originally posted by Zahos

Even if you wanted to use it in the same fashion as an AFC, wouldn't you still need the software to tune it?

no you don't need the software to tune it in afc mode.

The software allows FULL mapping of fuel and ignition blah blah blah just like the PFC etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...