Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For sale... Fiberglass front diffuser to suit R32 GTR (brand new)

This diffuser will improve airflow under your car to increase front down force, while also channeling air to your front brakes.

This will also fit a GTSt, but if you're running a standard front bar you will need to modify the attachment hardware to raise the height, to match the bar.

I've been running one of these on my car for the last couple of years, but recently had to change the front bar due to an incident with a Wallaby. I bought a second diffuser as I thought I'd have to modify the attachment points to suit the new bar, but as it turns out I didn't need to use it.

So I'm just trying to get back what I paid for it.

$250 + $25 postage Australia wide

Local pickup is available from Nowra, NSW.

post-3204-0-97067600-1305365281_thumb.jpg

post-3204-0-44917600-1305365295_thumb.jpg

post-3204-0-53162100-1305365305_thumb.jpg

post-3204-0-25937600-1305365316_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364256-r32-front-diffuser-brand-new/
Share on other sites

im keen but what a pain to change the oil

There's a little window that is held on by two scews to access the oil drain plug. If you look carefully at the first photo, and you'll see it.

I haven't found changing the oil to be a hassle.

Have you got a photo of it from the front?

+1 to this.

Does it replace the N1 Brake vents? A pic from the front should clear up any questions that i have! Cheers :)

Here's a couple of photo's of my car from the front.

Please note though that my front bar in an aftermarket fibreglass one, and not a standard GTR bar. The front of the diffuser is hiding underneath the splitter extension I glassed onto the bar.

post-3204-0-47683900-1305444969_thumb.jpg

post-3204-0-21676800-1305445133_thumb.jpg

Are these designed for the standard N1 front bar? Will it sit flush with the N1 Lip or what?

Yes it is designed for the standard R32 N1 front bar (see the 2nd photo, in the first post)

I can't see why it wouldn't sit flush with the N1 Lip, though I haven't personally fitted one to the N1 bar.

With a little modification to the attachment points you can modify this to suit almost any R32 front bar, as I've modded mine to fit two very different bars on my car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...