Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

$6000 ONO

IF I DONT SELL IT I'LL JUST KEEP IT AS ORIGINALLY INTENDED

NOW THIS IS A REPAIRABLE WRITE OFF , WAS WRITTEN OFF WELL BEFORE NEW RULES CAME OUT.

IT IS SMASHED ON THE LH A PILLAR SO GUARD AND DOOR, FRONT WINDOW ALSO CRACKED

ALSO RH SIDE DOOR AND SILL UNDER DOOR AND REAR QUARTER

DEFINATLY REPAIRABLE

STILL STARTS DRIVES TURNS ALL THAT

CLEAN ON THE INSIDE , NEEDS LOVING ON THE OUTSIDE!

HAS FACTORY ZENNON'S ON THE FRONT

1998 R34 GT WELL STARTED OUT AS A GT , CURRENTLY TURBO

2006 COMPLIANCE

37000 KMS

HAS A R34 GTT TURBO CONVERSI0N FITTED TO THE RD25DE ENGINE

HAS A BUILT 4 SPEED AUTO WITH A 3200RPM STALL CONVERTER TAKES OFF LIKE A SLINGSHOT VERY VERY FIRM SHIFTS

R34 GTT DIFF

KONI ADJUSTABLE SUSPENSION ALL ROUND

ADJUSTABLE UPPER AND LOWER ARMS

X FORCE CAT BACK EXHAUST

18 INCH LENSO'S

BLITZ DUAL SBC

BLITZ FATT TURBO TIMER

FRONT MOUNT AND POD FILTER ALSO

THERE IS PROBABLY MOORE I HAVE MISSED

PM FOR MORE INFO OR CALL TOM 0403392718

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365811-r34-skyline-repairable-write-off/
Share on other sites

no offence meant here but there is AT least 8-10K of damage there if you are paying someone to fix it. that is good for a parts car unfortunately.

no offence meant here but there is AT least 8-10K of damage there if you are paying someone to fix it. that is good for a parts car unfortunately.

8-10 grand?

You must get ripped in QLD then

Thanks for your un requested comment

  • 1 month later...

Habibi Repair Special...

This car wouldn't drive straight after that accident damage - no matter what you did to it.

You must use a poor quality panel beater or be one yourself if you think you can’t repair that correctly to drive straight again.

A bit of time and skill goes along way......

Habibi Repair Special...

This car wouldn't drive straight after that accident damage - no matter what you did to it.

Ah just shows some people have no idea!

Edited by burko1

You must use a poor quality panel beater or be one yourself if you think you can't repair that correctly to drive straight again.

A bit of time and skill goes along way......

and I agree but unless you crawled under it physically and looked at how bent it was both of us would only be speculating. I persoanlly figure that the front laft A pillar is bent, the side panel inner support , door and sill need doing at a guess new there is easily $3k or so in new parts.

I pointed this car out to a mate of mine that buys them ex japan and he's still said it would be better to strip than repair. maybe thats what the new oncer wants with it.

Noneed for Brian to crawl under it.it's on my hoist for him to walk under and suss out.

It's not that bad but I do have another shell lines up to donate some straight sections from.

It'll never see the road again though, I didn't buy it with that intention.

Edited by Risking

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...