Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just wondering what sort of kms people are getting from there 34gtrs. I have full exhaust, nismo panel filter, power fc and 1.2 bar boost making 245kw. I'm only getting bout 300kms out of a full tank and that's with half highway kms. Does this seem normal???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367307-fuel-economy-r34gtr/
Share on other sites

Might need to improve state of tune & check AFRs

Previous Black R34 GT-R > 460-470km/tank stock with 3" exhaust/hi flo cat and HKS F-Con V-Pro 1 bar (228awkw)

Current B/Blue R34 GT-R > 390-400km/tank with -7s, 3" exhaust/hi flo cat, cams, gears and PFC-D-Jetro 1.5bar (300wkw)

MAD082-Nah even turning the boost back to .7 bar and driving very sedately its still churning out black smoke and chewing the fuel. Even my mate commented when he was behind me in his evo in traffic at how much it puts out.

Thanks Sean for that info.

Edited by sinistaGTR

if it's pumping out a decent amount of raw fuel then you should definately get it looked at. could be a tune issue, or a mechanical/electrical issue causing it to use extra fuel. may be an issue with the AFM, injectors, fuel pressure reg, TPS or a few other things. best to try and suss out if there is something wrong before simply getting it tuned, because if something is starting to fail then it may get worse and then when you fix it the leaner tune could make it run too lean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...