Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can see through at night, however I have great eyesight

I suggest reducing your masturbation count down to once a week may improve your eyesight and you will be fine.

Ahh the normal post from someone who cant deal with the fact some one disagrees with them. Be-careful your intelligence is showing.

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

Clearly your a bit blind either that or you cant read. I said I can see through it well enough. I never made it was the same non tinted windows.

And all of a sudden because I dont have the same opinion as you im a bender?.

I can never understand people that dont agree that have to get abusive as your self to try and make your point

clearly you don't agree that's fine say it and move on.

see thought it well enough? what well enough not to mow someone down like a cyclist that you didnt see his little LED light through your black glass? regardless of how good anyones eyesight is it isnt going to make the tint anymore transparent is it?

i never got aggressive except to say that stupid shit like this is why all the good info on SAU is lost in a pile of crap thats shovelled by yourself.

yes you are a bender, now please return to your QLD threads or even better sell any nissan branded cars you own and buy a commodore because you will fit in more on streetcommodores

who is this bender? cos his saying that with 5% of the visible light transmission at night, which means 95% of visible light is blocked out by the tint that he can see clear as day (night), i dont think Troys the one with his hand on it mate. you'll be able to see headlights and street lights and about fark all else on the street.

by the way its useless pricks like you that clog up informative threads with your bullshit. so make like a tree and faaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkk off :action-smiley-069:

Of course no one would consider this aggressive at all, what was I thinking ??

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

You missed your first post that started it

Whether you like it or not is one thing, I for one thought it looked awesome from the outside. Fact remains, you CANNOT see through it in either direction at night, and it's illegal. You'd be stupid to have a car that gets driven in any kind of darkness with that kind of tint on the door-windows.

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

Surely you must know that it's only text that comes through on the web not tone or emotion. If that came through we would all get on and fighting on the net would be reduced by 95%. Much like the light coming through my windows ha ha

You missed your first post that started it

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

Sorry I didnt realise you were a moderator and could tell people where they could and could not post.

Just because some one doesnt aggree with your opinion doesnt give you the right to spew forth abuse

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

Edited by waxracing

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

Your welcome to your own opinion

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...