Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can see through at night, however I have great eyesight

I suggest reducing your masturbation count down to once a week may improve your eyesight and you will be fine.

Ahh the normal post from someone who cant deal with the fact some one disagrees with them. Be-careful your intelligence is showing.

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

Clearly your a bit blind either that or you cant read. I said I can see through it well enough. I never made it was the same non tinted windows.

And all of a sudden because I dont have the same opinion as you im a bender?.

I can never understand people that dont agree that have to get abusive as your self to try and make your point

clearly you don't agree that's fine say it and move on.

see thought it well enough? what well enough not to mow someone down like a cyclist that you didnt see his little LED light through your black glass? regardless of how good anyones eyesight is it isnt going to make the tint anymore transparent is it?

i never got aggressive except to say that stupid shit like this is why all the good info on SAU is lost in a pile of crap thats shovelled by yourself.

yes you are a bender, now please return to your QLD threads or even better sell any nissan branded cars you own and buy a commodore because you will fit in more on streetcommodores

who is this bender? cos his saying that with 5% of the visible light transmission at night, which means 95% of visible light is blocked out by the tint that he can see clear as day (night), i dont think Troys the one with his hand on it mate. you'll be able to see headlights and street lights and about fark all else on the street.

by the way its useless pricks like you that clog up informative threads with your bullshit. so make like a tree and faaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkk off :action-smiley-069:

Of course no one would consider this aggressive at all, what was I thinking ??

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

You missed your first post that started it

Whether you like it or not is one thing, I for one thought it looked awesome from the outside. Fact remains, you CANNOT see through it in either direction at night, and it's illegal. You'd be stupid to have a car that gets driven in any kind of darkness with that kind of tint on the door-windows.

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

Surely you must know that it's only text that comes through on the web not tone or emotion. If that came through we would all get on and fighting on the net would be reduced by 95%. Much like the light coming through my windows ha ha

You missed your first post that started it

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

Sorry I didnt realise you were a moderator and could tell people where they could and could not post.

Just because some one doesnt aggree with your opinion doesnt give you the right to spew forth abuse

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

Edited by waxracing

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

Your welcome to your own opinion

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...