Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've gotta ask, what's with the seemingly random 60 sets on 1 exercise with reps all over the place?

While you're answering dezz' question, I did ponder what made you decide to stop after 1 rep of 72.5kg on BP, up the weight and bust out 5 reps with 10kg more weight...

There's a program called PPP (Progressive Poundage Program), link: http://ptcfrankston.com/progressivepoundageprogram.html

It's designed to run for 11 weeks to reach a desired weight, for example I'm doing the 160kg squat program and the 105kg bench program.

Normally you'd squat on a monday, bench on a wednesday and deadlift on a friday, train the lift once a week, following this program, i.e. week 1 you do week 1 of the program, week 2 you do week 2 etc, all the way up to week 11.

For the first 6-8 weeks it's like 5 work sets per session and then in weeks 8-11 it bumps up to 6-7 work sets.

I want to do more volume so I simply do the following weeks in the same session do get the volume.

So if you look at my most recent bench session, the red is week 3 I think from memory (which is what I'm up to), then I also did week 4 (the blue) and week 5 (the purple, maxing out on the last 2 sets and an extra max set at 60kg).

BP

Bar x 10

40kg x 10

60kg x 10

72.5kg x 1

82.5kg x 5

75kg x 5

72.5kg x 5

72.5kg x 5

72.5kg x 2

85kg x 3

80kg x 5

72.5kg x 5

72.5kg x 5

75kg x 2

87.5kg x 3

82.5kg x 5

75kg x 9

75kg x 8

60kg x 14

In the big squat session I did a few weeks back, I did 5 weeks worth of PPP lifting. I don't follow the program strictly but use it more as a guide to the bare minium I want to be doing each week, and then do however more I feel like on the day. I've got 2 bulging discs in my lower back (no deadlifting for a while) and some days my back is great, others not so great, so it influences how I train, i.e. heavy, or more volume with a lighter weight etc. I enjoy lifting and don't do it for any set goal or competition, if I take it too seriously then it just becomes a chore, but that doesn't mean I don't train seriously when I'm in the gym, if that makes sense? :)

Some notes on my training: I train Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Alternate between squats and bench press, and then do some assistance work after depending how I feel and how much time I've got as some sessions go well over an hour. What this means is one week I'll bench twice and squat once, the following week I'll squat twice and bench once, so it's good to give the body a rest like that whilst still training hard.

Edited by GHOSTrun
  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah k, I bought the PPP but never ended up using it

I find it's good for helping me with consistancy. They say it takes 4 weeks to turn something into habbit, so this is a good way to get yourself into a solid routine.

I'll be moving onto PPP in a couple of months. The guy who trains me is the one who wrote that, but right now I'm small enough to see good gains from doing squat, bench and DL 5x5, 3 days a week.

So you are training at PTC?

Yeah, 3x a week for about... 8 weeks now?

Best gym I've ever been to. Not only for the awesome equipment, but it just has a great environment and atmosphere that makes you really push yourself.

Awesome man, I train at the PTC in Brisbane. I often go down to vic too

18/11/11

BP

Bar x 15

40kg x 10

Had a go at max bodyweight for reps challenge and did 70kg x 18

72.5kg x 2

85kg x 5

80kg x 8

80kg x 6

80kg x 5

80kg x 5

60kg x 17

Front Plate Raises

25kg x 15

25kg x 15

12 Pullups

5 Chinups

23/11/11

SQ

Bar x 10

40kg x 10

70kg x 10

90kg x 5

120kg x 1

120kg x 12

140kg x 5

140kg x 5

140kg x 5

140kg x 1..stop..vomit??, wtf??? lol! No more Red Bull during training

140kg x 4

140kg x 4

140kg x 3

145kg x 2

O/H SQ

Bar x 20

22.5kg x 20

S/S Standing Goodmornings

22.5kg x 15

25kg x 15

I'm 6' and still look like a twig. Markos reckons if I want to be competitive at my height I really need to be around 100kg lol. Spoke to him about you, apparently you used to live them or something?

I've also started PPP this week, seems like an awesome program.

I've pretty much been around since day 1 of PTC, lived in Vic for a while, fly down 3 times a year for the comps etc. If it wasn't for Markos and the original fitness, diet & bodybuilding forum on ns.com I'd still be doing 20 sets of bicep curls and weighing 50kg

30/11/11

BP

Bar x 10

40kg x 10

60kg x 5

80kg x 3

100kg x 1

100kg x 1

100kg x 1

80kg x 8

80kg x 6

80kg x 7

80kg x 6

80kg x 6

80kg x 5

70kg x 9

70kg x 8

60kg x 12

Front Plate Raises

25kg x 16

25kg x 12

KB Curls

14kg x 25

14kg x 20

haven't read ur entire thread, just wondering...why are you doing so many sets? Is BP bench press? 16 sets of bench pressing? isnt that a bit excessive?

and only 1 at 100kg? im sure u can do more!

My arms are tiny, lucky to just make 13" when pumped = stuff all muscle so I think that explains the weak pressing. I've been trying for ages to get them to grow, they just don't. Anyhoo I still train them hard. My 1RM at my last powerlifting comp was 100kg, so tonight I've done 3 singles of that and will work on increasing the total number of reps for the session at that weight over the coming weeks. The reason for so much volume is to build strength-endurance. I think part of the reason they won't grow is because they're not fit enough to stimulate enough growth during a normal type session, that is not lifting heavy enough for enough reps. Anyway we'll see how I progress over the next 6-8 weeks. Track back and check the progress for my squats, the above method is doing wonders for it.

Edited by GHOSTrun

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...