Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Good to hear that this has worked well for you mate. Now time to dyno it to have a power figure to work with :P

Well, I got it dynoed a week ago, completely stock turbo 5psi, 134rwkw which is pretty basic for a stock rb25det (auto), i was told boost it to 10psi could get another 30rwkw maybe? will have to find out :)

good o hear :yes:

Hypothetically i get an increase of 30RWKW, that will make it 165RWKW, what would be the next best thing to do to this engine to make it say hit the 200RWKW mark and be safe for stock engine and running gear?

just after some informed opinions, the next best mod or change to get it to the 200 RWKW mark :)

high flow turbo or a garrett aftermarket turbo GT3071x

thanks, i was hoping there could be other mods without changing the turbo? or can you get a decent turbo for a few hundred and just straight swap? :) just after 200rwkw :P

If you haven't already:

  • 3" exhaust turbo-back exhaust
  • a front-mount intercooler

That with an ECU tune should see you around 200rwkw

Hell, my R34 was doing 182.7rwkw with just a 3" exhaust, and an intercooler - still on factory boost solenoid (saw peaks out to 8psi).

I've since fitted a 10psi R32 actuator; I would hope mine will do in-excess of 200rwkw once my ECU is tuned (I have an un-tuned nistune fitted)

Unfortunately in your case with an R33, a nistune is a less straight forward exercise, but an ECU (R32/Z33-based nistune, PFC, etc) should be your next step assuming you already have an exhaust, FMIC. This will help get rid of the factory overly-rich AFRs. It might also be worth considering your fuel-pump if this hasn't been replaced already. They do tend to wear, and require replacement.

If you haven't already:

  • 3" exhaust turbo-back exhaust
  • a front-mount intercooler

That with an ECU tune should see you around 200rwkw

Hell, my R34 was doing 182.7rwkw with just a 3" exhaust, and an intercooler - still on factory boost solenoid (saw peaks out to 8psi).

I've since fitted a 10psi R32 actuator; I would hope mine will do in-excess of 200rwkw once my ECU is tuned (I have an un-tuned nistune fitted)

Unfortunately in your case with an R33, a nistune is a less straight forward exercise, but an ECU (R32/Z33-based nistune, PFC, etc) should be your next step assuming you already have an exhaust, FMIC. This will help get rid of the factory overly-rich AFRs. It might also be worth considering your fuel-pump if this hasn't been replaced already. They do tend to wear, and require replacement.

Hi, yes i have FMIC and CAI and 3inch turbo back+hi flow cat, stock 5psi actuator seen 134rwkw, now i have r32 actuator im hoping at least 30rwkw increase, and then push for another 30 with a tune or something without changing turbos, surely you can reach 200RWKW off a stock rb25det with little mods I have mentioned? thanks

And then for some strange reason, at some point after these mods 200kw just wont satisfy any more. Keep in mind that everything else on the car will need replacing/upgraded sooner or later if the power output is increased significantly.

Once you make the decision to modify your car, there is no turning back.

Just a warning haha

I ran my car with the stock turbo on 12.5psi making roughly 215rwkw. The supporting mods were, Coilpacks, FMIC, Turbo back exhaust, Power FC, 740cc injectors (however you won't need to upgrade injectors or AFM to hit 200 rwkw). So a small list of mods should see that power figure :D

just chuck it on a hub dyno and make 200 as is!?

heey guys, just wondering since changing the actuator to R32 should I get a tune? like the car runs quicker but still average at the 0-60 mark? can i tune my standard ecu at all? will it make much difference? or wat should i, could I do to make the car have more response?

mate, take this advice onboard and run with it coming from sum1 who has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on cars in the past 5 years...

like a few other members said once u get to that "200kw" mark u NOW want once u acheive it u wil want 250, then 300 n so on, TRUST US, u wil, its a like a drug lol

go straight for a power fc, easy to tune and retune afta other mods r put in place (always pop up for sale on here and ebay)

next would b fuel pump and z32 afm

afta that id go coil packs, and direct replacment injectors

and finally turbo (either garret or precision)

if i were u id save all ur penny and do this at once, yes it may cost arounfd 5grand but if u do 1 thing at a time, retuning it everytime to support the next mod

u wil spend thousands just on tuning when u could b spending that on quality upgrade mods and get a 1 off tune...

beauty of have say 250-300rwkw is if u want that 200kw u want just turn the boost down (high boost switch is fun n convenient :)

i think every1 here wil agree with this post, save time, money and go have fun....

Yep totally agree with the post above. Spend all the cash on buying all the upgrades then save and have them put in or DIY and then get a tune. Otherwise you will end up paying a crazy amount on a mod upgrade and tune.

Most things you won't worry about getting a tune with, for example putting that actuator on, you really don't need a tune but look at getting an aftermarket ecu as the stock ecu's are no good for tuning :D

So you want more and more and more power, and a GTR style body kit .... why don't you just buy the right car = sell your Gtst and buy a GTR. It is the only real answer. As everyone has said above, you will continue spending significant amounts of money to get more power .... start on the right foot and just buy a GTR!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...