Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have 12 degress on intake and 10 on exh, and with stock cams and stock turbos the R32 makes 292rwkw @ 19 psi, the 34 has 10 degress intake and 4 exh with poncams and -7s made 310rwkw, so 8 in and 4 exh i doubt thats going to cause the problem.

I'd be looking at the intake pipes for a leak or crack, check all hose clamps are on right and tight, check the BOVs bolts are done up tight, even go around the plenum with a can of brake clean with engine running and see if idle changes at all to see if a gasket has given way or a small hose hasn't come off.

6/7 kw is a sizable loss but not what your looking at as the problem but something I'd be looking at improving

Take out air filter and stick a screw driver handle in the airbox to hold it open and see if that helps

them mayby look at different dump pipes as x-force are an upgrade to only the stock 32/33 stuff but only just and are not the best, I picked up 20kw (290 awkw to 310rwkw) from changing from HKS dump pipe to the CES Comp Series dumps and front pipes, I hate knocking stuff so this is really only a suggestion

Thanks for the post. I didn't know you could run that much boost with stock R32 turbos. I'd say DVS JEZ will go through those things providing the compression test comes back ok to start with. Also... could leaking piping be the issue if its still making 17 p.s.i which I'm guessing is read at the inlet manifold? Which is after all the piping, cooler etc?

And as far as I know the xforce dump pipes are an exact copy of the hks ones (split type) that surely should be sufficient enough for 300+kw?

from what ive read and from before/after dyno graphs i dont think that the dumps would be the issue

they would be 100% fine for 300kw and lots more

XKLABA i dare say that ur 20kw gain would have mostly been from ur front pipe change, there are large gains had from changing to bigger diameter front pipes

you can run that boost for short spurts, dyno and drags but not burnouts or track events and have done so for 8 years now with two sets of turbos, first set had to be changed cause the bearing where gone with 4mm + shaft play and no damage to either wheels.

yeah comp test is a good start but if it isn't given a slight wiff of blue smoke from exhaust then i'd say comp would be good, a small but consistent leak would be over come with the boost controller making the boost level, also check there isn.t a leak around the exhaust manifold before the turbos, even a small leak will rob power.

Joe, the design of the dump pipe can make a big difference ( bigger then front pipes ) in both responce and power and if you get to see the CES comp series pipes in real life you can see way they work so well, I've tried a few styles on both the 32 and 34 and i have CES on both now, the normal ones on the 32 with equal lenght front pipe and the longer comp ones on the 34

I remember reading a thread in this forum where some had a mildly modded gtr (around 300rwkw)

they performed a before and after test using stock dumps and then some after market larger dumps

the difference ended up being 3 fifths of f#ck all

not sayin ur wrong but at these sorta power figures i dont think the dumps make that much difference,

not doubting that CES arent a better dump either, i just dont think the dumps are his power problem

ill see if i can find the thread

As data point, I'm running xforce split dumps with -7s on 17psi and making 305kw. Factory air box. Another reason not to focus on the dumps at this stage is that changing them is a big job, so you only want to consider it if you have very strong indications that they are the problem. So, IMO, forget the dumps for the moment.

What are your front pipe dimensions? FWIW the primaries on mine are 56mm ID and the secondary is 76mm.

Other than front pipe, I'd be looking at your inlet side for leaks or restrictions.

What spark plugs are you running and what gap? I had an issue with mine when I first got it Dyno tuned, ended up having something like 0.6mm spark gap

Had spark blow out and wen we turned the boost up more it didn't gain any extra power

To be safe I changed my coilpacks and coilpack wiring loom too

MrStabby - front pipe is exactly the same dimensions as yours.

SiR RB - I'm not sure what the gap is as I left that all to the tuner but I know the plugs are just the ngk cheaper ones

I have faith in DVS JEZ to get to the bottom of this Jon

Checked the front of the exhaust cam for wear? how is the ignition timing be set? don't use the loop at the back of the motor, get a plug lead and shove it up coil #1, then run the light off that, with the TPS unplugged.

Edited by iplen

Checked the front of the exhaust cam for wear? how is the ignition timing be set? don't use the loop at the back of the motor, get a plug lead and shove it up coil #1, then run the light off that, with the TPS unplugged.

This means get a timing light, remove No 1 coil get a old school lead for twim cam cut it in half stick one end on the spark plug and the other end in the coil and read the timing light off the lead, we on the other hand just open the timing light reader and hold it against the front of the coil with it still in place, to check if you base timing is correct.

+ 1 on comp results

as for the dump pipes, it was a suggestion for something to check as a possibility, coming from things i have exprienced in the near 10 years i have been playing with these cars and was something I reseached heaps in the path of getting the 32 as fast as it is.

The front pipes on 34 where the HKS ones with a 76mm in and 80mm out equal length, I don't think there was 20kw from changing them.

Just trying to help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...