Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/

http://www.skylinesa...-goods-on-oils/

Both of these thread give "[#10151] An unknown error occurred" whenever I post, the post comes up but I get the error each time, both threads are over 100 pages.

Any idea why this happens? Workaround? Or should we just make another "thread #2" once they get to 100 pages?

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384743-10151-an-unknown-error-occurred/
Share on other sites

I have an idea, on another forum I frequent when threads get in the 100 page range the deleted posts in that thread start to get towards an entire page of deleted posts, this puts the page count as a whole page greater than the amount of posts the users can see, it results in a page that doesn't exist, but the forum software thinks it should, causes strange things to happen.

Maybe put that to them?

That is if it actually gives one - it seems intermittent.

Sometimes i cant post to a certain thread, sometimes i can.

Bit hard to debug intermittent issues like that, when it might not occur for a couple weeks.

As i said - IPB 3.2 has fixed ALL the issues that I know about here on SAU. Everything from permissions to embedding youtube clips. I've also been able to post in the "trouble" threads on the Dev machine... So ye, I think if IPB dont know, then we should go and upgrade sooner rather than later.

That is if it actually gives one - it seems intermittent.

Sometimes i cant post to a certain thread, sometimes i can.

Bit hard to debug intermittent issues like that, when it might not occur for a couple weeks.

In those two threads I posted it happens 100% of the time for me, it does in fact post the post, but it gives you the error as well, so people often end up reposting the post 100 times thinking it hasn't posted.

Does it happen every time for you on those two threads?

No it does not, i just tested again (as i have before)

It's not repeatable and only certain people are having issues. There is no specific trend as to the type of user (access driven). It's totally random with who/when it affects. 100 people might be fine in one thread, but then 5 of those 100 might have issues in another.

Hey Rolls,

Thanks mate, I think that with the time I have off over Chrissy I might just hammer the new 3.2 version so we can release that. There were so many issues in this version of invision and they are all gone in that one. I know its a bastard, but it wont be long. :(

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...