Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So effectively all lift does is get more air in/out because the valve opens more but still opens and closes at the same time.... Correct?

Where as a larger duration will extend the time in which a valve is open and there for move the power to a different point in the band... Correct?

Also duration is calculated by the amount of engine degrees that the inlet or the exhaust is open for while LSA lobe separation angle is the amont of overlap of the inlet and exhaust...correct?

These are half startment half question replys btw :)

Yep, you pretty much have it there.

Advertised duration is different from duration at 0.050 open as well. Ramp rate, advertised duration, duration at 0.050 and overall lift all have an impact on what the camshaft will be like in the engine. Two cams with the same 0.050 duration but different advertised duration will have different efficiency at different RPM.

I apologise if this makes things more confusing but it's just to point out that looking at a cam that says 270 x 11.4 tells you nothing about what the cam will achieve. Knowing all the information is critical to knowing exactly how it will perform.

LSA is important for scavenging effect as the boost pressure or inlet fill will push the exhaust gasses across the top of the piston and out the exhaust while the valve is still slightly open. LSA has other functions but this is part of it.

Timing the camshaft is just as important as getting the lift and duration correct.

awsome cheers for the reply

can u go a bit more detail into duration and advertised duratation? examples and why we have it like that maybe?

trying to get my head around it

thanks

A good example would be a Tomei camshaft. Their catalogue may refer to a camshaft being 260 deg and 9.15mm inlet which is a Poncam for a GTR. The 260 degrees is from the point where the cam lobe is lifting @ 0.050 (50 thou) until the point at which it is closed to 0.050 (still open slightly). The advertised duration may be something like 295 degrees because it is measured at 0.004, 0.006 or sometimes up to 0.020. It depends on the manufacturer and the application the cam is being used (solid vs hydraulic) as to where they report their lift. Most try to stay at the 0.050 for ease of comparison but some will still report advertised durations. If you get two camshafts with the same total lift and advertised duration but different lifts at 0.050 inches, the one that has the smaller lift at 0.050 would indicate the ramp is very fast because it has to get from the smaller lift at 0.050 to the overall lift which is the same on both shafts. This means the valve is opened at a much more accelerated rate. Air speed into the cylinder is slower but the cylinder can draw it in much more quickly. The engine with this cam will make power a little earlier even though the duration and lift can be reported as the same.

A slower ramp means air speed increases more efficiently into the cylinder and much more smoothly at higher rpm so the power is made slightly later.

You can still get a pretty good idea of what a cam is going to do from the basic lift and duration that the manufacturer - especially the japanese brands who don't give you any real information on the profile but it's not always the case when you are buying custom made or cams that are made locally

*edit* I should also point out that the timing of the lobe is very important as well. Having them open and close at the wrong time is just as bad as having the wrong lift and duration for the turbo that is fitted (camshafts should always match turbo the same as torque converters should). We recently dialed in a set of Surecams on a GTR that was making about 450hp at the wheels. The lobe was way off. So far, in fact, that we had to move the camgear on the belt one whole tooth and then adjust it further to get the correct opening at TDCE. It made a further 80hp when we did

A good example would be a Tomei camshaft. Their catalogue may refer to a camshaft being 260 deg and 9.15mm inlet which is a Poncam for a GTR. The 260 degrees is from the point where the cam lobe is lifting @ 0.050 (50 thou) until the point at which it is closed to 0.050 (still open slightly). The advertised duration may be something like 295 degrees because it is measured at 0.004, 0.006 or sometimes up to 0.020. It depends on the manufacturer and the application the cam is being used (solid vs hydraulic) as to where they report their lift. Most try to stay at the 0.050 for ease of comparison but some will still report advertised durations. If you get two camshafts with the same total lift and advertised duration but different lifts at 0.050 inches, the one that has the smaller lift at 0.050 would indicate the ramp is very fast because it has to get from the smaller lift at 0.050 to the overall lift which is the same on both shafts. This means the valve is opened at a much more accelerated rate. Air speed into the cylinder is slower but the cylinder can draw it in much more quickly. The engine with this cam will make power a little earlier even though the duration and lift can be reported as the same.

A slower ramp means air speed increases more efficiently into the cylinder and much more smoothly at higher rpm so the power is made slightly later.

You can still get a pretty good idea of what a cam is going to do from the basic lift and duration that the manufacturer - especially the japanese brands who don't give you any real information on the profile but it's not always the case when you are buying custom made or cams that are made locally

*edit* I should also point out that the timing of the lobe is very important as well. Having them open and close at the wrong time is just as bad as having the wrong lift and duration for the turbo that is fitted (camshafts should always match turbo the same as torque converters should). We recently dialed in a set of Surecams on a GTR that was making about 450hp at the wheels. The lobe was way off. So far, in fact, that we had to move the camgear on the belt one whole tooth and then adjust it further to get the correct opening at TDCE. It made a further 80hp when we did

and the exact reason why any engine builder always asks for the detailed cam specs prior to intalling the f**kers...cause if you dont have them you are f**ked potentially

and the exact reason why any engine builder always asks for the detailed cam specs prior to intalling the f**kers...cause if you dont have them you are f**ked potentially

yeah pretty much. I haven't seen it because we don't often play with standard cams but I have been told even the stock camshafts in RB26's and 25's are way off for lobe angle and lobe timing. Always pays to check.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...