Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey chumps.

Can anyone identify, what this is (see attached images), i CBF'd trying to trace it back to the ECU.

It has JECS stamped on it, if that helps.

I got rear ended about 3 months ago, got the car back, dead battery, gah, then once i got the car running it wouldn't idle, sometimes it would idle for about 30 seconds drop around 650rpm then just die, cough cough cough.

After cleaning out the AAC valve, which kind of helped it still didn't fix the issue.

Then i remembered the beater mentioning that he found a plug loose in the boot, i just ignored it, assuming it was from the antenna which i ripped out ages ago.

However i plugged the lil bastard in and what do ya know, my car idles again, however to the effect that it now hunts, which it never used to before.

But if anyone with an insight into this lil device, would make my day, because it's given me the shits.

Keep it Sidewayz kidz :D

I personally think its some sort of resistor as it has a moulded rubber backing. But i'm just spitballing.

post-81730-0-66019200-1325667501_thumb.jpg

post-81730-0-63024600-1325667507_thumb.jpg

post-81730-0-24705900-1325667512_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387219-wtf-is-this-m8/
Share on other sites

Looks like a fuel pump dropping resistor. It slows the speed down of the fuel pump under idle conditions most likely for noise, emissions and wear on the pump. Sounds like a plausable reason for your fault thats for sure.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387219-wtf-is-this-m8/#findComment-6175544
Share on other sites

Have a look if there is one in your engine bay. Passenger side on the strut tower housing. If there isn't, they may have re-wired it into the boot.

Edit: That might not be exactly it, but it's the exact shape and appears to be the same size. So as above, I'm guessing it's fuel related.

Edited by Truffles
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387219-wtf-is-this-m8/#findComment-6175962
Share on other sites

ah k, my m8 who had done a rb25neo conversion in his r32 4 door, said its the injectors resistor :S, said he had to put the r34 one in for it to work.

Fuel pump dropping resister does seem to make more sense, cause it gives the same characteristics of a car that has no fuel.

All is well however, car is running beautifullly, the AAC has decided to resurrect itself , i cleaned the AFM and its not hunting any longer, and is much more repsonsive off the line now, no hesitation.

I highly recommend doing it it's made the car feel new again.

Thanks anyways guys :) Have an awesome new year!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387219-wtf-is-this-m8/#findComment-6176649
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...