Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people, I was wondering if someone can tell me the differences between R32, R33, R34, and N1 spec GTR turbos, and how to tell them apart?

Seems that the GTR I bought off Andrew last year has neither near new, nor R34 turbos - they are completely stuffed - oil seals gone, heaps of play, and nicked wheels, so I'm looking for another pair.

Seems there are some well priced near new pairs out there, but I'd like to be sure of what I'm getting since I've been burnt once already.

Also, what are people's ideas on N1 vs 2530 vs GT-SS turbos, given that I liked the spoolup on the current turbos (usable boost at 2000, full boost of 1bar at 3200), and that I'll probably do some mods over time (like Power FC, dumps, etc), but don't want to do any internals (except maybe cams - I already have adj cam gears)?

Any help would be appreciated before I splash out next week on a new pair to rescue my car from the workshop (I've been pining for 2 weeks already :) )

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38822-gtr-turbo-info-needed/
Share on other sites

if you included markings it wouldve made my job easier!!!(being a slow typer!!)Anyway...here....

model part number Turbo type A/R

Bnr32 14411-05U20 T3 0.42

Bnr32 nismo 14411-06U00 T04B 0.42

Bcnr33 14411-24U00-4 T3 0.42

Bcnr33 N1 14411-24U10 T3 0.42

Bnr34 14411-AA300 C100 053

Bnr34 N1 14411-aa401-3 C106 0.6

I have heaps more info....what else you want to know??I have 2 BNR34 turbos in the shed also :)

Cool, thanks for that ylwgtr2...helps a lot to figure out what's what...

I know that the N1's are non-ceramic, but what about the standard R34's ?

Are the 2 you have stock R34 or N1?

Hey DeanJSL, yeah...seems that for what I'm looking for, a pair or 2510/N1/GT-SS should suit fine.

As far as I'm aware The only difference between the R34 N1 and the R34 N1 NUR spec Turbos is that the later came with Nismo extensions.

There were only 100 R34 nur spec. GTRs produced.

I have an as new set for sale at the moment with the Nismo dump pipes.

$3750.

Phillip

(07) 40698449

Ok. I was offered the dumps with them for a bit extra, but I'm a bit cash deprived at the moment , especially since I might yet be up for more engine repairs (the turbo replacement is stage two of the fault finding).

I think dumps will be the next thing to go on my car, I know what a difference it made on my last car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...