Jump to content
SAU Community

So.. About Those Vehicle Status Checks..


Recommended Posts

If anyone has been looking to buy a car in the last few days and has been doing their research on particular cars on whether they are written off or encumberanced, they may have noticed that it now costs money to find out those last two details.

Does anyone else find it absolutely insane that what was once a free check to ensure you don't buy anything dodgy, now costs money and less and less people will now bother to pay to know the current status of the car? Sure it may be stupid not too but why change now? Revenue raising at its best.

http://vre.vicroads.vic.gov.au/

Borci88.

Yeah u gotta pay to check if its stolen/written off now, that sucks good on ya vicroads

Then again its only $3.70 and also checks if it has money oweing but adds up if u keep car shopping

Edited by Johnie

I checked last week and it's free online, it's only if you want a peice of paper saying so.

Yes this changed from last Friday, now it costs $3.70, while it doesn't seem like much, Crispy is right in that I take a few that I like and check them and if they're good then I go further.

It's an arbitrarily silly charge for them to make for what was a free service, but...can't see how it should affect you too much, short of being a minor speedbump when buying. If you're serious about buying the car then $3.70 is nothing in the scheme of things and it shouldn't really matter at what stage the background check is done, as long as it's before you hand over your big wad of cash / put down a deposit. Realistically, how many cars are you going to come across where the seller hasn't been honest about the status of the vehicle...just go check them out and if it seems all good hand over your $3.70 for a background ;)

If this is all good, so what do we pay tax for then?

if all government departments become profit making centers then will we pay no income tax in the future?? :mad:

and, so when did society shift from the "what can we do for you" to the "what can we do you for" paradigm"

talk about have your cake and eat it too!!!

EOR

They should keep this free, $3.70 is a joke... absorb it into the crazy taxes and fee's we pay to transfer a car into our name...

It costs VicRoads a hell of a lot more than $3.70 to recieve a phone call from someone complaining that they have bought a stolen / written off / etc car.

Surely it would be in their best interests to keep it free and encourage people to use the service?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...