Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have read somewhere(on the net) that the NISSAN RB20DET/RB25DE/RB25DET/RB26DETT are interchangeable(this is backed up by the fact that the JUN flywheels for these engines are the same part number!) and the factory ones are made from cast!(don't know what grade steel?)

Some aftermarket ones are made from forged Chrome-molybdenum steel!(and some are even made from Aluminum!!)

but I'am not quite sure about the pressure plate though because they would probably have different clamp pressures! But the pressure plate(standard) is made of Nodular iron!!

MEGA

P.s but don't trust me because I drive an auto!!!(will be manual very soon! :uh-huh: )

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-64253
Share on other sites

Thanks Mega. I am new to skylines and still have a lot to learn. My thoughts are that a bog stock RB25DE may have a nasty flywheel, where an RB26DETT may have something far better that is not going to go out through the windscreen at 8000RPM.

As you say, the RB motors probably all have a similar sized flywheel, but the quality of material may vary.

I have actually seen a cast grey iron flywheel split in two when accidently dropped onto concrete (woops !)

Am planning to put an RB26 crank and rods into a GTS-4, and am just wondering if the stock flywheel is up to the job.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-64287
Share on other sites

Didn't think that you could use RB26 crank in a RB25?

(maybe I don't know? :confused: )

RB25DE

Bore x Stroke (mm) 86.0 x 71.7

RB26DETT

Bore x Stroke (mm) 86.0 x 73.7

Might work but to what benefit? I have seen RB26 heads on RB25s and a few RB26 heads on RB30s and even RB25 head on a RB30 but none used internal parts from the RB26!!

this is a site showing the benefits of such a head convesion!(RB25 head on RB30 block)

http://www.autospeed.com/A_0004/article.html

MEGA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-64303
Share on other sites

RB25, RB26, and RB30 all have 86mm bore. It is the RB20 that has the smaller bore. I also understand that the 4WD blocks are different from the "normal"blocks in that the pan rails are wider apart for the special sump.

The RB26 crank is far heavier and more sturdy, it is also fully counterweighted, in other words there are two counterweights one on either side of every conrod. The RB25 crank is less strong and rather crude in comparison. Still a bloody stong crank though !

I also need to lower the RB25DE compression from 10.5 down to 8.5 (guess why). By putting all the RB26DETT stuff into an RB25 block I get to keep the same engine number (hee hee) and no one will ever know. I just want to make sure the flywheel is not going to be the weak link. It iwill all be going into a 33GTS-4.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-64402
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Warpspeed

Safety is the uppermost thing in my mind, and the reason for this thread. It looks like either a stock RB26DETT flywheel then, or one of the standard weight steel aftermarket ones.

Thanks heaps REV210, that is the information I am after.

The aftermarket ones are the way to go. They can be as light as 4 or 5 kgs, faster reving/boost and less strain on the gearbox are benifits.Ogura make a fairly cheap one from chrome-molly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-64478
Share on other sites

I've got a chrome molly flywheel and straight away i noticed it was actually a hell of a lot easier to get moving.

When the crank/cam belt was out one tooth it was very gutlless off boost.

It is also a lot easier to rev' match gearing down and can be done a lot quicker..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-65944
Share on other sites

Hi Joel. Originally I was thinking only to get a standard weight steel flywheel that would take a bit of a rev without exploding.

However, rev210 and yourself have now got me thinking a bit about flywheel weight.

With 4WD turbo cars the BIG problem is getting the car moving from a standstill, with a larger than stock turbo and decent cams, this only becomes worse. Launching the car at a million revs is a bit hard on the driveline ! I do not think a squirt of nitrous is really a practical solution on an everyday streetcar, although it certainly does work.

I am planning something a bit different. A supercharged GTS-4, designed to have a large amount of torque over a wide rev range. A light flywheel is going to make a lot of difference in first gear, and I will not have to launch the car.

I agree with what you say about rev matching and faster engine response. The GTR six throttle body setup is also a step in the right direction for fast throttle response as well.

Hmmmmmmmmm interesting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3955-flywheel-question/#findComment-65998
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, i’m making Vag coil loom for rb25det, can anyone confirm the wire guage i’m using for power supply in diagram is enough for supply not too small for loom? For earth do i need to follow the same procedure or i can use only 16awg wire for all coil and their connecting wire following to the plug?
    • Did you panel beat the dents or have you tried to repair this only using filler?  Is your sanding block soft/flexible and is following the shape of the panel rather then just knocking down the high points? 
    • I haven't knocked them down yet. I think I made the repair more complex than it should have been. I had rock chips combined with waviness and dents and I tackled it all in one because it was near each other and just end up wasting a bunch of bog lol. I'll knock down those areas and see how I go. And yep what you are saying at the end is correct. I think I might be sanding the top of a steep hill then my sanding block falls into the dent and gets rid of the guidecoat if that makes sense. Though shouldnt unless I'm covering too big of an area with not a long enough block. I'll try something new and provide some updates. Getting there though! Thanks as always.  
    • Yeah makes sense, hard to comment on your situation without seeing what your doing. I was talking generally before, I would not be looking to randomly create low spots with a hammer to then have to fill them.  It's hard without seeing what your doing, it sounds like you are using the guide coat to identify low spots, as you're saying the panel is still wavy. I don't see how you're not ending up with patches of guide coat remaining in a wavy panel? Once the high spots are knocked down to the correct level, surely to have a wavy panel you need low spots. And those low spots would have guide coat still in them?
    • So I'll put filler past the repair area a bit to make sure I don't miss anything. Then I'll block it until it's almost level, put the guidecoat, then keep blocking until it's gone. Then it's still wavy.  In regards to hitting the panel, I saw this video might give more context - Skip to 0:47 he knocks it down. But yeah I'm sanding until the guidecoat is gone then checking because otherwise my filler is still well above the bodyline. Unless what you're saying is I should put guidecoat around it early, surrounding the filler then stip once it's gone?
×
×
  • Create New...