Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nissan R33 GT-R v-spec

1995 model with 65xxx kms

Has been resprayed in Fusion Red.

so hear it is...

Engine mods

HKS adjustable cam gears

full stainless Kakimoto exhaust

Garret 2860-5 Turbos

stainless intake with trust pod filters with Z32 AFM's

gates timing belt

Extreme cushion button clutch (brand new less then 300 Kms on it)

Split fire coil packs

Have had all fluids replaced, including radiator flush, using motul 300V engine oil. When i removed the filter i cut it open to inspect the contents - there was no eveidence of any metal.

Just had Gearbox removed and some new bits fitted inside as 4th gear was just starting crunch

-Had all new synchros

-3rd an 4th gear selector hubs replaced

-input gear replaced

-other parts have also been changed have receipt to prove

OVER 3,000 dollars(this price does not include the clutch that was put it at the same time) on the gearbox an its all under 300 kms since it has been done!

Engine management:Power FC(no hand controller)

Suspension/brakes etc

ZEAL coilovers fully adjustable with 6 stage dampning

RDA slotted an dimpled rotors on all 4 wheels

QFM brake pads all round

Lenso D1R's 18x10 black with Red groove

strut braces forward an rear

have got currently FALKEN RT615 semi slick 245/40 R18

inside the car

Clarion DVD pop out unit with ipod connectivity

has a switch so it can played while driving

Clarion amp

has front a rear twitters and different speaker

Security: viper 5901 alarm system which is brand new also

Does have remote start application but isn't hooked up but can be by someone that knows what to do.

bad points

theres no floor mat in drivers footwell so the carpet there is average

rear L/H pod has crack in it

passanger window switch U/S

unregisterd will put 3 months on it for the price i want

PRICE:$18,000.00

contact via PM or ph 0431 019 455

I do go away for work but normally its only overnight, if i dont pick up just send a msg an i will get back to you

cheers Ryan

post-42253-0-46958400-1332558826_thumb.jpg

post-42253-0-13716900-1332558869_thumb.jpg

post-42253-0-30838900-1332559074_thumb.jpg

post-42253-0-91854900-1332559109_thumb.jpg

post-42253-0-22857900-1332559157_thumb.jpg

post-42253-0-93397900-1332559494_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/395752-r33-gt-r-v-spec/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...