Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.82 is too small small for a VL, yet for a 260z! :D

last 2 VLs i have put GT35/40s on with .82, ended up changing to a 1.06 with 1 month of road driving.

.82 are fun, but boost comes on too hard to quick. (again this comes down to the application of the car, .82 would be good for circuit work.)

I'm going with a gt3040 on the rb30det

The car weighs 1200kgs and I am unsure if I should go 1.06 or .82?

The engine wont be reving past 7000rpm and aiming for 500hp at the fly.

Using a turbo that generates extra power past 7000rpm for this motor would be useless.

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if boost response is a priority use a GT30R with the larger 1.06 exhaust housing and a large external gate.

Hi DP33, it's great to have a turbo educated person on the forum, please hang around, lots. Can you please explain the above? I would have thought a .82 would have been more responsive. I have found engines with "excessively" large wastegates to be very poor controllers of boost ie; lots of fluctuations. Whereas engines with "correctly" sized wastegates have good boost control. My experience has been that "correctly" sized is a bit smaller than is usually recommended.

If I can ask one more question, what are your thoughts on the Turbonetics T66 compressor as far as "up to date technology" goes?

So what exactly is my turbo??

AR .70 Intake

AR .82 Exhaust

The center core has Japan Allied Signal. 700177-17 CK0103J

GTR-Ben,

this core number is not listed as a standard Garrett core.

It must a variant from HKS.

does the plate say anything else on it apart from the CHRA Part No.?

Revive the dead thread :D

I was pretty much sold on the idea of the gt3040 but the seller of the internally gated gt3540 has come back to me and now I am tempted again.

Is it really too big?

What would be the effect?

Bear in mind that it will be cheaper than the GT3040 which seems to be mid to high $2000's plus supplying your own rb25det exhaust housing?

3540 internally gated, u will never be able to control boost with a internal gate on that turbo.

Why is that?

at around 15psi I thought it still may be up to the task?

Maybe you think that this power level will only keep me happy for a short time before i get silly with the boost? I am sure this will not happen due to a few thoughts of mine:

My 3L engine is not built with stronger internals, don't want to break anything.

I never plan to run 20psi+ for power runs etc, numbers are not my interest.

i have fully seam welded the car, but short of a full cage, the paper thin chassis will have trouble with too much torque across it.

250 at the rears will be plenty.

To testify to the power delivery I want, i almost bought a VH45 before this motor was built.

Anyways, I appreciate the input and if you can clarify to me why you think this it would be great

Thanks

the internal gate is so small it cant bybass enough exhaust gas to control boost properly and creates 2 much back pressure in the exhaust system. Internal gated turbo are good for little T28's.

It doesnt look THAT small :aroused:

You answer your own question.

"250 at the rears will be plenty' at this sort of power a GT30 will be fine - a gt35 will be a bit of overkill, unecessary lag. The bigger the compressor, the later you should be making boost or else you will get surge.

If you want to go a GT35 internal gate, make sure you run a decent AR ratio on the turbine, otherwise the internal gate will have to do too much work. If you can imagine that wastegates are like taps - the more flow you need the bigger the tap should be (garden tap v's fire hydrant). If the turbine AR is too small, it will not be able to pass enough gas to hold lower boost pressures, resulting in boost spikes. Also, the larger the AR, the greater the lag - its always a compromise somewhere.

Thanks,

I understand, I guess I am just looking to take advantage of a bargain.

the big online suppliers all do an internal gated GT30 or GT3040, I think on an exchange basis with the stock turbo to use the exhaust housing. These are over $2k plus the exchange turbo which I dont have, but they seem like the way to go for this application.

If u had the choice, (to anyone out there), Out of a GT35/40R (Part number 714568-0001) and the HKS 3037s (both with 0.8 housings) which would u choose?

Money is no problem, and all support sysytems are taken care of. I have the choice of both of these, but dont know which to choose....I am leaning towards the HKS 3037s though.

Going on an RB31DET (same as Joel's:))

The wastegate is just the little flap on the right, so yes it is small

I understand what it is, but i was referring to its size respective to the CD on the left. Considering popular external gates start at around 38mm, it doesnt look that far off.

If u had the choice, (to anyone out there), Out of a GT35/40R (Part number 714568-0001) and the HKS 3037s (both with 0.8 housings) which would u choose?

Money is no problem, and all support sysytems are taken care of. I have the choice of both of these, but dont know which to choose....I am leaning towards the HKS 3037s though.

Going on an RB31DET (same as Joel's:))

Garrett GT35R

but i am biased

Guest INASNT
I understand what it is, but i was referring to its size respective to the CD on the left. Considering popular external gates start at around 38mm, it doesnt look that far off.

Any performance shop u talk to will always tell u to go external gate with such a big turbo. Coz in the long run u r better off

to all,

fwiw, the BA XR6 turbo doesn't have any problems producing 250+ rwkw with an internally gated Garrett GT35.

if it's lower boost you're looking at running, i think it should do fine.

Bl4ck32,

what's your power target? this should help u make your decision.

the HKS 30307S (A/R .87) will help you make up to 330-340rwkw on anywhere up to 25psi, but the Garrett GT35R will allow u to make closer to 380rwkw with the same boost, although bare in mind, the garrett GT35R has larger wheels so the response would be worse when compared to the HKS GT3037S.

but then again, it all depends on how much power u want, and how u want it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...