Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i cleaned out my aac valve and its still hunting at idle and dipping a lot with power loads(fan, steering).

When i first got this car i didnt know about setting the idle on the aac valve and i used the little screw to open the throttle slightly.

Does the throttle need to be fully closed/sealed for it to idle properly? Is this in effect an air leak as far as idling is concerned?

Also the computer idle screw is set to full low, all the way counter-clockwise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397139-idle-problems-rb20det/
Share on other sites

Hey mate, first you will probably want to check your TPS is set correctly, so just double check that is reading .48 volts at idle, if not adjust and reset the computer. Once that is set, if your IACV needs adjusting you should just be able to turn the idle control screw and this should alter the idle speed as soon as you start turning, if this does not occur you may have an issue with the oxygen sensor (my IACV would not alter the idle speed AT ALL with the oxygen sensor plugged in, turned out it was not wired correctly, but once disconnected or wired correctly, the IACV once again had become operable with the idle screw). The screw head should only need to be pretty much flush with the outermost part of the housing, not in too far or out too far. Just make sure you give the IACV a really good and thorough clean as once the carbon builds up on the black diaphragm this adds friction and does not allow free movement once the valve is moving.

You should also return the throttle? screw to the standard position, the less variables, the more likely you are to find the actual problem.

Why did you clean the IACV? Did you have idle issues previously or? I had idle problems for close to a year, both the TPS setting and the 02 sensor had a massive part to play in rendering the IACV useless, only once I had both the TPS and 02 sensor working correctly did all the idle issues go away, but it was instantly, as soon as the other interferences were gone.

Thanks thats helpful, but..

How do i test the tps? (.48 v from where?)

Also the idle does seem to adjust slowly (delayed reaction). So theres an issue somewhere.

Can i clean my O2 sensor?

Ha! this is like science, the answer to one question leads to two more questions and so on ad infinitum.

Ps. thanks for help.

Hey mate, the TPS throttle position sensor is a little black box with a plug which sits on the throttle body, there is a plug right facing, and three wires which come out the bottom of the unit, you need to measure the voltage beween the middle and right facing wires of the three wires out the bottom, it should be around .48v at idle, and move up to around 5.v at wide open throttle, if you havent played with this it may be ok, you can also test this on reds without the car on. The valve you are playing with at the back of the plenum there is the idle air control valve, and you will need to ensure all the soot is gone before trying again, take the whole unit off, including the silver housing and give it all a good clean. You can unplug the 02 sensor while trouble shooting the TPS and IACV.

Yes always had idle issuesWhat exactly is the IACV? is that the AAC?

Theres no diaphragm in my AAC, just a soleniod, spring and valve.

it must be the old type.

May have used the wrong term haha just clean everything, and ensure its back together properly.

Ok, closed the throttle completely, re-adjusted the idle on the aac(iacv) now its fine, responds well to power loads and no hunting.

Tps must be ok too, thanks for the exact info on how to test.

That info should be saved for others. or put in diy/faq.

thumbsup.gif

I read somewhere that SAU is the best skyline resource on the web and if you search you know its true.

Its still playing up! dagnabbit.

On a cold start it idles at 1100 then over a minute it climbs to 1900 then drops suddenly back to 1100.

If i restart it idles at 850.

thats bad for a cold engine, i can hear funny noises when i switch off to restart.

Any ideas? im stumped.

Hey mate, I believe that is just the engine attempting to reach operating temp quickly as possible. Let it warm up, allow it to drop to 1100 RPM then adjust the IACV. I actually idle at around 1000 RPM anyway, helps with the brass button clutch and stalling. BTW, have you still got the original BOV working or replaced with after market atmo BOV?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...