Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Trying to replace this trim peice ?

Is it a weather strip what the hell do i call it?

Any one know were i can get a set from?

How hard are they to replace there for a 32 gtr ?

runs along the outside top of the door against the glass

see picture (the thing my finger is on)

post-84752-0-83329700-1339648725_thumb.jpg

Edited by vorse
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/402538-trying-to-replace-weather-stripp/
Share on other sites

These things are bloody expensive, replaced mine new from Nissan about 6 months ago. The part you are pointing to is also connected to the rubber piece above your finger. It is all mounted on a slim piece of metal which runs across the top of the frame and also runs down the side. To replace, you need to pulll out the rubber weather shield which sits just inside of this. This will then give access to the screws which hold the thin metal strip and rubber/plastic pieces in place.

I have my old ones here which are in good condition, but i am in Perth, where are you located.

If you are not in Perth, look at who is currently wrecking BNR32s near to you and buy one of theirs.

Part numbers are (not sure which is left or right)

NI-76870-04U00 (RRP about $450) S Mould roof

NI-76871-04U00 (RRP about $650) S mould roof don't ask me why one side is $200 more than the other, Nissan couldn't explain either.

I didn't pay this much as I can get stuff abit cheaper through Nissan

Good luck

Not two grand, only one :yes: . You only need both pieces, of which I have supplied the part numbers. (One left and one right)

Just find someone wrecking a GTR and buy theirs if they are in good condition.

I will take a picture soon and post to show you what they look like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...