Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

05/1998 Nissan Skyline R34 GT-T Manual Coupe. Car is in good condition throughout and has some minor modifications including:

Nismo damper adjustable Coilovers

Fujitsubo 3" Catback exhaust & 3" front pipe

Autobahn FMIC

K&N Pod filter

ANZ 19" rims with brand new tyres

Car drives great with plenty of power. Has factory Zenon headlights and ABS. Original Nissan Japan service logbooks up to 90,000k's before importation. Still has original key with central locking. New battery fitted 1 month ago.

Interior has 2 small cigarette burns on each front seat and 1 burn on the rear seats from Japan.

Selling as is without registration. Any inspection welcome and price is somewhat negotiable.

Price: $10,500

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020501.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020492.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020490.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020489.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020494.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020495.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020500.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020498.jpg

http://i160.photobuc.../P1020499-1.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020507.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020503.jpg

http://i160.photobuc...00/P1020508.jpg

Car is located in Emerald, Victoria. If interested contact Shane on 0422816780.

Edited by Shano3000
  • 2 weeks later...

Have been looking at your car on carsales funny to find you here and then I was like oh sold... oh wait not sold uh...

I had a question which may seem obscure but kind of vital. I have a steep driveway, am I going to need to get height adjustable coilovers to get up it? most cars going up and down it 'crunch'

Selling as is, so no roadworthy.

The horn recently stopped working, so that will need to be fixed. Apart from that, I don't see any issues, but i'm not a mechanic so don't hold me on my evaluation.

Engines good, has service history up until 90,000k's. No issues, paints good, interior could use a decent clean.

If you or anybody is interest, it's best to come inspect the car for yourself.

I saw that it has service history up to 90,000....

Have it had regular services in the last 57,000ks (since you have owned it)

One last question... Has the reo been cut to accommodate the FMIC? Just worried about getting a RWC

Im not asking for a service history...

basically...

How long have you owned it for?

Have you serviced it at all during the time you've had it..

IF so rough guesstimate of how often you serviced it...

Was the 100,000k service performed

I'm assuming you have owned this since 90,000ks... or am i wrong

Edited by Megahowler

I had a question which may seem obscure but kind of vital. I have a steep driveway, am I going to need to get height adjustable coilovers to get up it? most cars going up and down it 'crunch'

are you serious? -_- fml some of the noobest questions on here

are you serious? -_- fml some of the noobest questions on here

That's just the start of it...

Throw me offers but no lowballers. I worked out i could make about $8,500+ wrecking this car (and will do so if i don't get reasonable offers), so save me the hassle and buy it whole for that price.

Edited by Shano3000
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...