Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all hope use could help me with a few questions I have a 33 v spec I just took the motor out as doing some work and new shell ect, any way I was thinking of going single turbo just wondering what ya thoughts where? Is it worth it

But I main question is what sort of things do I have to change to go single? And what turbo do youse recommend my current mods are engine:

* low km reconditioned head

* HKS 272 cams

*CP forged pistons

* argo conrods

* balanced crank

* ACL race bearings

*Nitto oil pump

*new water pump

* sump baffle

* splitfire coils

* R34 N1 turbos

* stainless dumps

* 3"exhaust with HKS muffler

* metalcat

* walbro 500hp fuel pump

*700cc denso injectors

*adjustable fuel reg

*Z32 a/f meters

*apexi pods

*alloy radiator

*power fc

*greddy profec b ebc

*oil catch can

Drivetrain:

* Jim Berry carbonic race clutch

* nismo flywheel

*nismo slave cylinder

*cusco front diff

Let me know what you guys think:)

Depends what power you want really, I've had two RB26 set ups essentially and the one I have in my GTR now is the best I've had (the stock unopened motor is holding it back alot however) I have had 3 single turbo set ups on my GTR to date.

I'm currently running a Precision Billet series PT6262 turbo charger, un real response full 1.6 bar by 4200rpm on 98RON however with a built motor my peak power would be a lot better. Previous set ups have included a Garrett GT3582R and a Turbonetics T66 (plain bearing 0.90 roughly housing) I've never liked the poswer delivery of twins however they may have their advantages in the 3-360kw range. However I have no complaints since changing to a single high mount plus the maintenance is a hell of a lot easier :)

  • 3 weeks later...

Awesome thanks mate :) is it a lot of stuffing around to go to single? Sounds like you have some awesome setups!!

What do you have to change to go single? Do you still get aircon ect. I was reading that some people change a heap of stuff I'm not gonna go to big just something that looks nice and is resposive

if your arfter a bit more kick, why not just get some -5's? you have good supporting modes in place and they will just bolt up to your current setup. would be a cheaper option then going single.

single would require new intake piping, exhaust manifold, dumps and front pipe etc.

If your keen on the single route, i see alot of people getting good results with a t04z

Depends what power you want really, I've had two RB26 set ups essentially and the one I have in my GTR now is the best I've had (the stock unopened motor is holding it back alot however) I have had 3 single turbo set ups on my GTR to date.

I'm currently running a Precision Billet series PT6262 turbo charger, un real response full 1.6 bar by 4200rpm on 98RON however with a built motor my peak power would be a lot better. Previous set ups have included a Garrett GT3582R and a Turbonetics T66 (plain bearing 0.90 roughly housing) I've never liked the poswer delivery of twins however they may have their advantages in the 3-360kw range. However I have no complaints since changing to a single high mount plus the maintenance is a hell of a lot easier :)

What power are u making with 6262? What boost

Well it made 320kw on around 20psi which I'm

Not happy with however it may have something to do with the only mildly decent tuner up this way tuned it to around 10.8:1 afr's lol so it would make 350 or so leaned up a bit... However I was also after a bit of life from the stock motor to so I'm not complaining.

Going to a single was the best thing I ever did for my GTR, in terms of changing things that's par for te course however it's definitely worth it.

My GTR is currently getting parted out.... So my turbo set up is for sale complete with hot side piping, dump and front pipe to suit 32/33 GTR and intake pipe lol

Sedat i have been very impressed with precision turbo's. I hve just finished a r34 neo with 5558(precision) it made 367kw on 22psi ethanol and full boost at 3900,

I have just fitted a 6262 twin scroll onto my personal GTR which i was planning to tune this week but found a water leak under the plenum so i pulled that iff tonight.

My aim is 400kw with full boost at 4200.

U should go a 65 series or so for 450+kw

was this neo built or stock?

Sedat i have been very impressed with precision turbo's. I hve just finished a r34 neo with 5558(precision) it made 367kw on 22psi ethanol and full boost at 3900,

I have just fitted a 6262 twin scroll onto my personal GTR which i was planning to tune this week but found a water leak under the plenum so i pulled that iff tonight.

My aim is 400kw with full boost at 4200.

U should go a 65 series or so for 450+kw

Sedat i have been very impressed with precision turbo's. I hve just finished a r34 neo with 5558(precision) it made 367kw on 22psi ethanol and full boost at 3900,

I have just fitted a 6262 twin scroll onto my personal GTR which i was planning to tune this week but found a water leak under the plenum so i pulled that iff tonight.

My aim is 400kw with full boost at 4200.

U should go a 65 series or so for 450+kw

Jez

Wait....I'll send you a pm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...