Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

When accelerating I find that my car seems to go faster when only using, say 75% throttle, but this only really seems to happen on cold nights.

During the day when it isn't too cold, I can use 100% throttle and car feels really fast, but on a cold night, use 100% and it seems to get a flat spot over 4000rpm.

I think it may be due to a boost spike (bleed valve) which I have noticed on cold nights, but I thought a spike wouldn't really rob power cos it only happens on a cold night when there shouldn't be any knocking (cold air), will the ecu retard timing based on boost alone or on the knock sensor?

I don't want to reduce my boost because it goes fine during a warmer day, and pls don't just say "go buy an EBC"!

Has anyone experienced this? Can anyone shed some light?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/
Share on other sites

I think you are right, it is the boost spike. The stock ECU will retard timing on excessive air flow = boost spike. Have a look at some data logging I have done for stock ECUs. The modified Skyline had more air flow and more boost.

http://home.iprimus.com.au/tkolo/datalog.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-828386
Share on other sites

Thinking about it a bit more, not sure if the cold air causes a boost spike which in turn means more air volume flow - it's prob more like the denser cold air meaning there is more air volume and that causes the boost spike.

Sort of the same thing, but you get what I mean.

so what can I do to fix?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-828673
Share on other sites

black33. I too have this very problem. After changing plugs, raping tape around the coils, and finally dyno tuning was told with the standard ecu it is only good for around 9.8psi before going into a default mode. After having it set at 11psi, I then finally set it to 9 and for sure didnt notice the pulling back at around 4000 rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-844069
Share on other sites

I don't think it’s the "over boost protection". There is one but like Black33 says it just cuts out the engine completely.

I think it’s the protective timing map programming. If you have a look at a stock R33 timing map the last column has a dramatic drop in timing from 23 to 8. So if with a higher boost you get close to that area you will definitely feel a flat spot.

Tom

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-844382
Share on other sites

but wouldn't this cut the car out completely, not just give you a flat spot like I feel???

Nope it retards the igntion timing and whacks in plenty of extra fuel.

can I bleed some air from the factory boost gauge line (or disconnect it) so that it thinks the boost is lower than it actually is, and it won't pull out so much timing

"Over boost protection" is what it is know as, but it is really "excessive airflow protection". The ecu makes this decision based on what the AFM is telling it. So boost really has nothing to do with it.

The fix is an SAFC, voltage clamp, Boost Cut Defeater or better still replace the std ecu with a Power FC.

There is one but like Black33 says it just cuts out the engine completely.

Yep, full cut is the next step in engine protection programming in the ECU, but you get "retard" and "rich" first.

Hope that clarifies

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-844790
Share on other sites

Hi Black33, I wrote this for someone else, but I think it answers your question....

The only way to solve voltage max out properly is to fit an AFM with resolution capacity at higher air flows. That means a Z32 or Q45 AFM. For example an Q45 AFM will only show 3 volts at the same airflow as a RB20 AFM will show 5.1 volts (the max). So as soon as you go over 5.1 volts of airflow the ecu doesn't know how much. Remember ~1.1 lb of airflow per minute = 10 bhp.

A RB220 AFM will go 5.1 volts at around 40 lbs, so 360 bhp. If you have an engine that makes say 400 bhp, the afm will show 5.1 volts from (40 lbs) 360 bhp to (44 lbs) 400 bhp. So the ecu won't know about the extra 4 lbs of airflow and it won't add fuel for those 4 lbs. This means lean A/F ratios = not so good.

A good tuner can get around this by using the rpm and throttle position maps to tell the ecu how much extra fuel to add. This is not perfectly accurate, so you make the A/F ratios a bit rich to be safe. Plus tuning the ignition timing is also pretty tricky, so it tends to be tuned a bit retarded to be safe as well. This looses some power and it takes a lot of programming (mapping time ) to get right. This cost usually exceeds the cost of buying an Z32 or Q45 afm.

All a voltage clamp does is stop the ecu seeing voltage over a set amount, usually 5 volts. This stops the ecu from using overboost (really excessive airflow) protection, ie; retard and rich. But it doesn't help the tuning, the effect is still the same as maxing out the afm airflow resolution as per above.

Hope that is of some hlep

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40365-less-is-more/#findComment-845097
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
    • You can set hard reserves on your battery system, and it can't be discharged past that.  
    • That sounds like an excellent idea. But total self-sufficiency means exactly that. You have no-one else to blame when your system faults out and you have no power for a week or two while it gets fixed. You'd have to go the whole hog and get a diesel genny and all the switchover gear, to get you through such times. And, despite the fact that over 20 years, my system has been pretty reliable**, I have seen so many inverter explosions (or less dramatic deaths), panel and roof JB fires, and so on, over that time, to know that the stuff is the same as any other bulk Chinese manufactured stuff. The failure rate is well above zero - both on the equipment and on behalf of the meth addled installation labour force. And then..... warranty and means of redress against the supplier you bought the gear from. Best I can tell is that only a handful of solar companies are still around within 5 years of starting their advertising pitch. They disappear and phoenix like crazy. So, as per 1st paragraph, I suspect the only way to is go balls deep and spend maybe 2-3 times as much as you might think, so that you have every base covered. Plus, know and understand your gear intimately, so you can diagnose problems, sort them out yourself, etc, etc. Plus, probably have to consider upgrading various parts as the years pass, to maintain compatibility with newer stuff, performance and reliability, etc, etc. Whereas, remaining attached to the grid has an ongoing cost that keeps going up even if you use bugger all power from it. But it does provide the fallback in case of the worst case with your own gear. You either pay up front or as you go, I suspect.
×
×
  • Create New...