Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

i think my o2 sensor is dead. my fuel economy sucks (250k's ish on a full tank) and my apexi pen timer doesn't read the o2 sensor value at all. my fuel economy has always been like this so i thought it was normal but reading some threads and doing some searching and it appears my o2 sensor is dead. i wasnt sure if the apexi pen timer was working properly cos it has never read the o2 value always displays "---" but ive checked the wring and it seems fine.

also when i had a dyno run on the dyno bbq day i got 141rwkw and it was running very rich and had some black smoke puff out

does anyone know where to get a new / 2nd hand o2 sensor from? how much?

any help would be great, thanks

Yea you can buy new ones for like ummmm around 150 i think but dont quote me! You can get second hand ones easily from workshops around the place usually like 80 or so not that expensive just make sure its ok before you buy it!

dunno but the 33 ones have 3 wires, im looking at my old one right now, I got a second hand one for like $80 from a workshop up here i know...check around you'll find one easy, they have heaps of them lying around!

nah its cool, ive already got a new o2 sensor just a bitch to fit and ive got really shit tools here. will organise with a mechanic to fit it for me and swap for a new radiator

hi all, have gotten the o2 sensor fitted and done. the ford el one did it fine. the apexi timer now shows the o2 value and it fluctates from 0.30 to 0.20 and 0.10 is this correct? upon de-acceration it goes to 0.02 and 0.01. however if i goto a/f it shows "---" still. am i missing something?

will update when i check my fuel consumption

the light for o2 goes from green to orange to red mainly at green when idle and orange when midrange accel and occasionally a spot of red if i stick it. ive only seen the highest about 0.40 shouldn't it be up near 0.60 ? the range as far as i know was 1.00 to 0.00 correct?

0.50 would be midrrange?

as in not lean and not rich

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, I still don't know why the idle speed control can't catch the falling RPMs. In the Consult logs I see the AAC duty cycle rising, but suddenly it goes lean and the engine stalls. Anyways, the relevance here is the DW 550cc injectors are probably the same. So if OP has similar issues I would be tempted to finger those injectors as problematic for whatever reason vs the ECU failing for some reason.
    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
×
×
  • Create New...