Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have a "noisy" rb26 head. I bought it reconditioned off another guy with camtech cams in it. It was still in the bubble wrap from the head reconditioners when I got it. Since then the motor is finished and running very well and making good power, but it still needs to be looked at as I can't leave it like it is, it's not excessive noise, but definately louder than your average rb26 with noisy injectors clicking away :)

I understand a feeler gauge is used to check between the lifter and cam for excess clearance yes?

Can someone give me a very brief run down on what I have to do in order too check them? I understand the cams might have to come out and back in a few times, I am cool with all that.

Cheers for any help.

All good, I dug up the r32 gtr workshop manual and it's all in there. Must learn to rtfw before posting.

Any pointers that might make life easier for me but, do tell. It looks like that actually use 2 feeler gauges to check it in the manual..

Yes measure the clearance with the lobes pointing up. Write down each measurement and double check them.

Very slow process.

Once u then remove the cams and buckets u need to measure the current shim thickness then add the measurement taken, then remove the required clearance from that total.

What does the workshop manual say as required clearance?

double check your feeler gauges before you start especially if you are going to do as they say and use 2 to get the measurement right, I started doing it this way and gave up and just used the one bent one. I used Precision shims down in vic ( from memory) for the new ones. If doing the job again on a head still on a engine i would probably consider installing a cam stud kit. You will see why.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...