Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

It really does not need it's own section.

Look how dead the RB30 section is by way of example. Given the amount of options/configuration and issues when setting up an entire motor... Just a fuel, no point splitting off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409098-e85-subforum/#findComment-6704897
Share on other sites

It really does not need it's own section.

Look how dead the RB30 section is by way of example. Given the amount of options/configuration and issues when setting up an entire motor... Just a fuel, no point splitting off.

it's not really a matter of how dead the thread is or will be....the RB30 section has alot of usefull information and in a small location that makes it easy to find.

If an E85 section can't be justified by itself, why not an alternative input section covering e85, racing fuels, NOS, water/methanol injection etc

Edited by wedge_r34gtr
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409098-e85-subforum/#findComment-6705540
Share on other sites

I like it becasue it makes Fuels a specific area

I dont know what other peoples thoughs are but on the GTR.CO.UK forum they have even made "Turbos" a sub forum so information can be found easier.

Not saying its wrong but "Forced Induction" itself is a very broad subject in my opinion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409098-e85-subforum/#findComment-6705564
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I have been searching for the complete E85 thread only found it becuase I saw this thread otherwise the search function doesnt show the thread up. So i reckon it a good idea to have it sub division only for finding the info better thereby you wont waste serve space with threads that could have been answered in one section.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409098-e85-subforum/#findComment-7113624
Share on other sites

I found it first shot?

Simply went into Forced Induction. Top right corner, using the search "E85 Complete"

It's the first result when using last post, obviously because you've posted in it.

Or

If you use the other filters for example "title" instead of "last post time"... It's the 8th result, and would be the 8th result regardless of when the last post was in it. It shows up no problem without the need for advanced search!

Hate to say it but the search is working fine, you are just not looking at it correctly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409098-e85-subforum/#findComment-7113713
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...