Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Simple fact: SAPOL have the power to defect a 100% standard, factory legal, straight off the showroom floor "insert brand of car here". The situation is no different to any of the other states and territories.

I'm not saying the above situation is fair, but it's the unfortunate truth under the current scheme :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-862104
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nuns arnt too bad if you get them all worked up:) sorry had to be said. Regancy are as pissed of with the cops as we are, If you talk tp Regancy nice enough they will let you through with no hassles. ( i got through with my white 32) not sure how.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-862385
Share on other sites

What servo is that? I drive past a R33 sometimes at Mobil on Lower Nth East rd, is that you??

Cheeky - good to hear that you are taking a firm stance on this, its about time someone does, just a shame it takes such a stupid act from a cop who has no idea what he is talking about to make it happen

Chris

Nah dude, thats that black 33 hey, he gets around all the mobils.

I work at the crappy caltex on bridge road ingle farm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-862613
Share on other sites

Just be careful if anyone is considering doing the back door defect removal. I have heard that the sh1t has hit the fan in a big way, and hundreds of cars and car owners are effected.

Police are doing full on video interviews with those that have been named as having cars taken off defect without going through regency. It would appear that a certain someone who works/worked there got caught and is spilling the beans big time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863023
Share on other sites

Well the only other way i can think of is some form of "hacking" or is that just too fantasy?

I mean if thats the way it is done then there would be alot of charges like electronic freud etc.

I dunno as painful as it is i think i would rather just go the manual way, although i've never been offered the other way so i suppose i couldn't really say.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863081
Share on other sites

I am having the matter investigated by the Police Complaints Tribunal. Shane (Never naughty) has been helping me alot with this matter.

I have to go to a panel interview and state my case and they will make a decision about my defect.

The only other option... is go through regency making sure everything is micky mouse.. prove to sapol my car was legal and make a claim for damages, for lost time, money, and stress against sapol.

Also, the day i got defected, i had a buyer for my car and it was to be sold.. now i have lost that sale.. thanks to those coppers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863578
Share on other sites

I c ur car a few times a week. Its the silver 33. Looks very clean.

Yep thats the one, yeah its not to shabby. Ive been preety lucky actually, havent been pulled over or even had a cop follow me ( touch wood). I suppose it will happen eventually like most people here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863591
Share on other sites

well at least you seem to be getting somewhere with your complaint. It seems SA import owners are getting pretty short fuses after all the hassles and pointless defects, just feel the hate in this thread towards SAPOL! Very soon someone is going to crack and they will have to change this bullsh1t "defect even if the cop suspects it might be defectable" crap. As everyone aggrees it is beyond a joke.

whoever mentioned it ( i think steve) is right about going higher than the cops and straight to the people who can change/make the rules. Surely if that person were to see/hear some of these absolutely petty examples that something could be done... The whole defect issue should be concentrated on safety anyways, not because the car makes an occasional noise on gearchange. The whole fact that ten year imports have better brakes and suspension than even new local cars is ridiculous.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863603
Share on other sites

I’m going to echo Steve’s comments on this one. I strongly urge you to go all out Erica. I know it’s going to be a pain in the arse for you but I really think you should take a stand. Let me know if you need any assistance? As I said to you on the phone, maybe give the media a shot? Hopefully if you/they (media) work it from the right angle it won't come across as a disgruntled car 'hoon' but rather an average motorist that has been unfairly treated.

The simple facts in your case are that you were defected for an item that was complete factory standard. Is that all they defected you for? And were you doing anything to draw the wrong kind of attention to yourself? If the answer is an honest NO in both cases then I believe it warrants some form of action to stop the same thing from continuing to occur. At the very least the situation where they (police) later agreed the defect “should” be removed, without the need for a full Regency Park inspection, should be highlighted.

I’m not saying that SAPOL should back-off and leave modified/import drivers alone completely (there are plenty of modified/import drivers on our roads that are drawing the unwanted attention in the first place! – this is the REAL issue) but what I would like to see is the police using common sense and judgement.

I guess when I look at the whole situation realistically, it really is fighting a losing battle : ( Modified/import car owners are, for the most part, seen by the wider community as “reckless hoons”. They (average suburban family member) probably see the police targeting as a good thing. They just think… “Excellent work SAPOL - less idiots on the road” The sad fact is in “some” cases this is pretty much true : (

Rant over.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863625
Share on other sites

Just be careful if anyone is considering doing the back door defect removal.  I have heard that the sh1t has hit the fan in a big way, and hundreds of cars and car owners are effected.

Police are doing full on video interviews with those that have been named as having cars taken off defect without going through regency.  It would appear that a certain someone who works/worked there got caught and is spilling the beans big time.

Mate i can go one step better then that, i can CONFIRM that this is happening, as i know of 2 people now that are being investigated for doing the back door payment from regency...A fair bit of other shit will be discovered as well when it all boils down, time will tell though...People's keep your heads down cause shit is hitting the fan big time on this one!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863646
Share on other sites

The problem that will be encoutered by approaching your local is MP is that at present this states MPs are pushing for changes to have yearly roadworthies introduced and special inspections required after certain accident damage. This would follow a similiar system as in NSW where roadworthies will be carried out by licensed private workshops. The RAA are currently opposing this and I think you may find that MPs are happy for police to be sending loads of cars through the regency VIS to overload the system to breaking point and force changes.

The higher authority at this point is the Police Complaints Authority who are an independent statutory body which answer directly to Parliament. Non of the staff are police officers. All complaints except in special cases (?? they dont detail what these are) are investigated by the Internal Investigation Branch. Any other form of other action at this point could effect the outcome of an investigation. Because this complaint will most likely be considered a less serious incident it should go to a conciliation process where both parties give there side and the complainant indicates what outcome they would like to achieve. A resolving officer will make a desicion normally within 14 days and the complianant can either except this or go forth with a full formal case.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863693
Share on other sites

I think what the problem is is that with all this extra policing and defecting, the REAL unroadworthy cars are still out ther whilst majority of modified cars are being targeted. For instance I walker through the back of mawson lakes carpark last week. i could easily see at least 30 cars (in a small carpark of maybe 150cars) and all of them were unroadworth. Smashed front head lights, crashed cars with no repairs done, cars with heaps and heaps of rust. And im sure they all would smoke like a biatch aswell.

I cant believe that these cars dont get defected and how a car with a BOV poses a much more dangerous "threat" on the road...

Ahhh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863841
Share on other sites

Your right Dean. Its total crap. I saw a car the other night smoking out so much black smoke the cars behind him could not see where they were going because of the huge amount of smoke coming out of the car in front. I then see a cop drive straight by!!

And Matt.. I was cruising 40kms around a corner nothing crazy just having a smoke and cruisin', so i was not being reckless at all.. I also was defected for JUST the stock factory blow off valve. The defect notice actually states "blow off valve to be conveyed to manifold" when IT IS!!! I also have more of a case here because the police officer defected me without having actually sited the defect.. he wouldn't even let me show him it was legal. therefore, i didn't pop my bonnet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-863904
Share on other sites

And Matt.. I was cruising 40kms  around a corner nothing crazy just having a smoke and cruisin', so i was not being reckless at all..  I also was defected for JUST the stock factory blow off valve.  The defect notice actually states "blow off valve to be conveyed to manifold" when IT IS!!!      I also have more of a case here because the police officer defected me without having actually sited the defect.. he wouldn't even let me show him it was legal.  therefore, i didn't pop my bonnet.

I knew you wouldn't have been doing anything wrong Erica. I was just making 101% sure :)

The situation so far... you recieve a defect notice for something that is in fact legal (that you state to the officer at the time). The officer doesn't even look under the bonnet to identify the 'supposed' offending item. And then by their own admission HHP officers later confirm that the defect "should" be cleared without requiring a full inspection. As far as I can tell you have a very strong case.

This 'defect without sighting the defective item' situation is a bit too much for me to accept. It's rediculous!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42029-defected/page/3/#findComment-864001
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...