Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm chasing at least 200 rwkw tomorrow.

Mods incl emanage, e-01 boost controller, hks split dump, hks 3" front, high flow cat, hks 3.5 cat back, trust fmic, k&n filter.

Tuner did preliminary air/fuel tune on Sat and got 48 extra rwhp (from 190 to 238). In kw terms that's an increase from 141.8 rwkw to 177.5 at .80 bar (11.6 psi). Misfiring at around 4500 rpm up. Could not tweak air/fuel ratios beyond 4500 rpm. He asked me to change the plugs.

I did that on Sun...NGK iridiums were replaced with NGK BCP6RES (.8mm gap). I had a heated argument with sales person at local Repco branch when he insisted that R34s do not use cheap plugs. I just asked him to shut up and give me the cheap plugs (geez this website is really very helpful). Amazing result! Engine now revs smoothly all the way up to redline.

So, I'm after an extra 32 rwhp (23.8 rwkw) to bring power up to 270 rwhp (201.4 rwkw).

Do you guys think it's achievable with the rest of the rev range from 4500 available for tweaking? (I was thinking of boosting it up to 1.0 bar).

I'm chasing at least 200 rwkw tomorrow.

Mods incl emanage, e-01 boost controller, hks split dump, hks 3" front, high flow cat, hks 3.5 cat back, trust fmic, k&n filter.

Tuner did preliminary air/fuel tune on Sat and got 48 extra rwhp (from 190 to 238). In kw terms that's an increase from 141.8 rwkw to 177.5 at .80 bar (11.6 psi). Misfiring at around 4500 rpm up. Could not tweak air/fuel ratios beyond 4500 rpm. He asked me to change the plugs.

I did that on Sun...NGK iridiums were replaced with NGK BCP6RES (.8mm gap). I had a heated argument with sales person at local Repco branch when he insisted that R34s do not use cheap plugs. I just asked him to shut up and give me the cheap plugs (geez this website is really very helpful). Amazing result! Engine now revs smoothly all the way up to redline.

So, I'm after an extra 32 rwhp (23.8 rwkw) to bring power up to 270 rwhp (201.4 rwkw).

Do you guys think it's achievable with the rest of the rev range from 4500 available for tweaking? (I was thinking of boosting it up to 1.0 bar).

Hi, yeah i had the emanage and the e-01 in my car for a while. The max I could get outta the stock turbo was .97. Unforunately our AFM wont allow anything else, was peaking out at 5 volts. Without a front mount/dump/highflow cat and with a 4" cat back i pulled 161rwkw on BMT's dyno. Mine used to misfire as well by when i installed the emanage it took care of that problem.

I'm about ready to install a PFC and z32 with a front mount. Just trying to decide where to get it all done. From what everyone is saying Ice I will probably be paying them a visit shortly.

Thanks for all the advise guys. Cheers....Nick

Another Q for the 34 owners, wat do u gap ur plugs at, .8 or .7.

Abo-Bob what turbo u running?

Toby19 Your trust front mount, i'm guessing that its the kit was designed for a 34 (designed as in all the piping came with the kit). I was thinking of ordering this as well but just wanted to ask was it hard to fit. I am planning on fitting mine. Does your kit go thru the battery shelf or around? A pic would really help me out. Thanks mate.

Nick

Groundrun,

Trust FMIC was designed specifically for the 34. No adjustments needed, body kit needs no cutting. pipes follow stock flow (cold air outflow is diverted to bottom of cooler to meet with stock throttle intake pipe. No hassles. With plug gap, like I said before 0.8mm seems to be the optimum for a mildly tuned car. Try it, it's not that expensive.

Abo Bob, I will be using 1.0 bar on stock turbo. Greddy E-01 has 4 boost settings: off-.55 bar (7.9 psi) which is the factory boost, low, high and over-take boost ( duration of which can be timed from 1sec upwards). I will be setting low boost at .7 bar (10.2 psi), high boost at .8 bar (11.6 psi) and over-take boost at 1.0 bar for 30 seconds (good for short spurts).

Groundrun,

Trust FMIC was designed specifically for the 34. No adjustments needed, body kit needs no cutting. pipes follow stock flow (cold air outflow is diverted to bottom of cooler to meet with stock throttle intake pipe. No hassles. With plug gap, like I said before 0.8mm seems to be the optimum for a mildly tuned car. Try it, it's not that expensive.

Abo Bob, I will be using 1.0 bar on stock turbo. Greddy E-01 has 4 boost settings: off-.55 bar (7.9 psi) which is the factory boost, low, high and over-take boost ( duration of which can be timed from 1sec upwards). I will be setting low boost at .7 bar (10.2 psi), high boost at .8 bar (11.6 psi) and over-take boost at 1.0 bar for 30 seconds (good for short spurts).

Groundrun,

Not very good photos but you will see that engine bay looks very stock. Both intake and outflow pipes are directed towards the same side. The outflow pipe is run from lefthand side of fmic through the bottom onto the right side. Cooler fits perfectly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...