Jump to content
SAU Community

Intercooler Install - Before and After...

Gizmo73

By Gizmo73,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gizmo73 Proficient

Gizmo73

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i think the red lines up with the red, and the blue lines up with the blue...you can tell by using the grid...

However, you are right in that the blue doesnt line up with the red...

As you can also tell, its the stock ECU with speed limiter - cant wait to get that powerfc in to that fix low and mid range 12.5 13 AFR !!

Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted
yea i know - not bad for a stock 93 ECU, huh ??.....

Bloody miracle I'd say. :D

I have never seen a standard R33 ECU produce A/F ratios anywhere near that good. Ignoring the speed limiter, are you sure it's a standard ECU?

dojobi Experienced

dojobi

Posted
Posted

If that's a stock ECU then I'll be very surprised too. I've also got a 93 ECU and when I had the exact same mods with 1 Bar of boost my AF ratios dipped into the 9s at one point and were generally in the 10s.

There's no chance your dyno operator could have changed the software on the dyno? It is shootout mode though, so this shouldn't affect it.

Gizmo73 Proficient

Gizmo73

Posted
  • Author
Posted

stock ecu, stock boost...

Knore - i wasnt claiming the dyno figure as i know this is way too high - rather the difference between the two readings...

Based on the AFR's they mustve got confused with either another car reading, or its some kind of mistake..

ill be getting a real boost gauge done soon - ill also get another dyno run and check out the AFR's and see if there is any difference..

otherwise, ive just wasted my cash on a powerfc !! :) :jk:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • TurboTapin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...