Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am looking to do a single turbo swap for my RB26, but Im not really chasing big power, even stock power or little over stock is okay, Im mainly concerend with responce and having a broad power band. and also the simplicity of a single turbo and accesability appeals to me. (working on the GTR is painfull compared to the GTST)

I was wondering how would the RB26 respond to a small single turbo, enough that it will spool very early and not choke out at the redline. Is something like a single GT28 turbo feasable? or even borgwarner's EFR series? (6758 or 7064).

Or am I wrong for thinking that a small single setup would be much more responsive then a small twin? (2530s for example).

We will asume that the motor is going have a stock head and stock bottom end.

Thank you for your time and knowledge.

Edited by Idon28
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423317-small-single-options-rb26/
Share on other sites

erm... from my limited knowledge on the RB26... the stock twin piping is fairly simple compared to say a Supra's or a RX7's and u can replace the turbos with silghtly bigger ones which will give u damn good response and power..

most ppl go for single setup because of the huge power and big single turbo that cant fit in the existing space. so IMO going for single but yet small turbo...wouldnt really make much sense rite? remember.. for single turbo, u are feeding 6 cylinders...and not 3 now. =)

remember.. for single turbo, u are feeding 6 cylinders...and not 3 now. =)

Thats what I'm getting at. With 3 cylinders per turbo, that makes for 1.3L displacement per turbine.

Wont driving a turbine with 2.6L worth of exhaust flow (The whole engine) result in faster spool up on a properly sized turbine as opposed to two small turbos driven by 1.3L each?

Imagine twice the exhaust flow for single turbo instead of having to split it up for two.

The larger compressor can probably be matched to compensate for the airflow the twins did.

Edited by Idon28

yes u are right in mentioning abt exhaust flow feeding the turbine. however there are some real life physical limitations to consider....

exhaust flow and ability to compress air is not infinite nor are they linearly proportional throughout. there is an optimal amount of exhaust flow for every turbo such that once u exceed it, even if u give the turbo more exhaust, it can only spin that fast and compress that much air.

thus ppl go experimenting with hybrid turbos... switching and swapping compressors and turbines.

hope u find that sweet spot with the compressor and turbine for your purpose :)

Thats what I'm getting at. With 3 cylinders per turbo, that makes for 1.3L displacement per turbine.

Wont driving a turbine with 2.6L worth of exhaust flow (The whole engine) result in faster spool up on a properly sized turbine as opposed to two small turbos driven by 1.3L each?

Imagine twice the exhaust flow for single turbo instead of having to split it up for two.

The larger compressor can probably be matched to compensate for the airflow the twins did.

If you put on a small single the engine will spool very quickly buy make very little power (much less than stock). There is no free lunch, whether single or twins you trade off spool for power. If you wanted max spool out of an RB26 you would get the stock turbos rebuild with steel wheels and get about 280kw.

I would suggest going with the likes of a FP HTA 3076 or 3582 as they are known to spool pretty early but still produce big power........ Inb4 Lithium :P

Lol you can't send me to this thread and then say that :P

Seems like quite a bit of work to go to, but the likes of an EFR7064 on a twin scroll manifold would be immensely impressive on an RB26 in terms of spool and response - and should be capable of respectable power too, more power than the stock turbos but not much and in no way comparable with GT2530s in power.

I personally wouldn't go with anything smaller than a EFR7670 (or a FP3076HTA like what R34Geeteetee suggested) on an RB26 - the spool of those units would still be at worst comparable with the stock turbos, or much better than GT2530s but still give a good power improvement... just not as much as much as GT2530s, probably half way between the stockers and GT2530s.

If you want to compare flow wise with GT2530s then you really need to be looking at things like an EFR8374 or FP3582HTA which will spool a lot closer to the GT2530 (still more responsive).

  • 2 months later...

Sorry to revive this thread, but I had a further question. I've decided on the gameplan, the RB26 unit won't be going into an R chasis, but into something much lighter, so high horse is no longer a requirement. So with the power goal of 300HP (220KW). which turbo would give me that goal with the earliest fastest spool? the 6258 or 6758? those have the same exhaust housing, just different compressors (the 67 is bigger, and I think that will be needed to achive that power level with a single). Or will that 64 AR housing be way too restrictive, and should I go with the slightly bigger 7064 turbo? (either .83ar or 92ar housing, would they be about the same? with the 92 bieng twin scroll and the 83 bieng single entry?)

I would almost think an N/A RB30/26 would be the way to go, but I would like to have some upgradabity and low expense, so I think a turbo is the more logical choice.

Thank you.

Edited by Idon28

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...