Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 S1 Gtst Problem Would Appreciate Any Help

Peanut92

By Peanut92,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

discoPumpkin Community Regular

discoPumpkin

Posted
Posted

^point proven exactly

Stupid pumpkin doesn't even know that other manufacturers made cars with the GTS appellation. Some of them were very large V8s. Like my Monaro. My 1971 Monaro. That I owned in the 80s.

Little boy should shut up, shouldn't he?

Um hate to break the bad news to ya matey but this is a Skyrine forum, not a holden forum... *facepalms. stop replying with crap and leave this forum to people who know whats going on, let this forum get back on track please no smartesness

no disrespect here, but GTSboy knows what he's on about !! If you don't know what your talking about you need to pull your head in and not look like a goose

:yes:

lol he knows what he's talking about? I've read both of your posts on a few threads and can tell both of u aren't smartest tools in the shed, again please don't confuse OP any more then he is. Just let the experienced guide him, cheers.

Peanut92 Collaborator

Peanut92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Gts4door is on the ball with the possible r&r theory as I took it for a drive today when she's on around 6 psi. Or what my boost guage believes is 6 psi. The car went really good good consistant power thru the rev range. No lag no flat spots/surging

Went like it should have. But I haven't touched the boost tee yet. It will only hit 9psi or so when I plant my foot to the floor. This run I just have it about 3/4 throttle

And as for lifter. Ill probably rule that out as it didn't sound like lifter. And only does it on boost if your off boost driving the car. Noth

Peanut92 Collaborator

Peanut92

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Gts4door is on the ball with the possible r&r theory as I took it for a drive today when she's on around 6 psi. Or what my boost guage believes is 6 psi. The car went really good good consistant power thru the rev range. No lag no flat spots/surging

Went like it should have. But I haven't touched the boost tee yet. It will only hit 9psi or so when I plant my foot to the floor. This run I just have it about 3/4 throttle

And as for lifter. Ill probably rule that out as it didn't sound like lifter. And only does it on boost if your off boost driving the car it doesn't make one noise

It's a very quiet motor

Also guess while I'm on this topic I have my 32 a run tonight and now I've upped the boost it seems to make some weird whine up around 13 pound. I drive it on 10 daily. Only usually does it past 10 pound. It's like a really high pitch noise. It's intermittant at first I thought it was air getting in my windows. But this time they were down

Kane_R32 Experienced

Kane_R32

Posted
Posted

lol he knows what he's talking about? I've read both of your posts on a few threads and can tell both of u aren't smartest tools in the shed, again please don't confuse OP any more then he is. Just let the experienced guide him, cheers.

Not sure if srs? GTSboy would have to be one of the most "switched on" guys on this forum...

Also guess while I'm on this topic I have my 32 a run tonight and now I've upped the boost it seems to make some weird whine up around 13 pound. I drive it on 10 daily. Only usually does it past 10 pound. It's like a really high pitch noise. It's intermittant at first I thought it was air getting in my windows. But this time they were down

Dude I had a similar noise in my R32, with stock turbo. Ran 12-14psi and it sounded like a cop siren when coming onto boost. I opted to swap to the RB25 turbo and noise disappeared (good bang for buck mod).

Tommmay Enthusiast

Tommmay

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just bought a s1 33 also and getting the ticking noise

It sounds like a manifold gasket to me

Or even to thick of oil. As soon as it gets to temp its gone so does not seem to be that bad

for the other issue your gearbox is not in snow setting is it

my kids where playing in the car and pressed it on snow without me knowing and man i thought the car was f**ked

Revving and going nowhere etc.

And i would check the plugs to i fouled mine in the first day i got it

Gapped some new copper ones to 0.8 and away i go

Edited by Tommmay

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...