Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'morning all,

I am looking to get a fella out to repair the thread on the rear most manifold stud hole on the RB20DET (if anyone can recommend someone good whom services the Gold Coast that would be awesome) Upon seeing that the average prices I could find on exh mani stud kits were $115 and UP, I took it upon myself to find an alternative.

Went down to the local nut "n" bolt (Coastal Bolts and Fasteners Labrador) and matched up the right studs. They are M10x1.25 for anyone interested and 14 of them (two for spares) cost me $25 or $30. throw in some washers and .10c a piece and some nuts for the same, it starts becoming a WHOLE lot cheaper than buying a kit. Without the spacers that I am asking about, the whole lot has cost me around $40. With the spacers it would cost me $50 MAX. Which is a whole lot better than the $115 or so to get the kit. $175 if you are getting them from Nissan themselves.

However, a dilemma I am having, is I have recently noticed that in the stud kits, are not only washers but actual spacers, and to top it off they are not all the same, cylinders 1,2,3 and 5 have one type, whilst 4 and 6 have another.

I can not seem to find anywhere what sizes these spacers are. Would there be any chance that someone on here might know what sizes they are? For the two different spacers needed. I believe they are spacers, they look like they are.

Genuine-Nissan-Stud-Kit-Exhaust-Manifold

As you can see in the image above, there are 12 washers, 8 thick spacers and 4 spacers a little bit thinner. All I need to know is what thickness they are. If anyone has some old exh studs left laying around with the spacers on them (PLEASE, not just a stud with a random spacer you chucked on there, but the actual required spacer) could you please measure the thickness of them. I need the measurements for both the thin and thick spacers (not the washers, just the spacers)

Kind Regards,

Michael

Edited by poeticjustice88
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/427135-exhaust-manifold-stud-kits/
Share on other sites

Hey mate, i have one of each in front of me. Also if you can find a manual, it's on page en-76. Looks like the same for rb20-25.

Measured with a tape measure (cause thats all ive got)

Smaller one is 5mm thick, 11mm inside hole and 22mm outside diameter.

Larger one is 5mm thick, 11mm inside hole and 24mm outside diameter.

Hope that helps

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...