Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello SAU

Car: r34 1999 4 door rb25de

Issue:

When I use the auto 'full up' switch on the drivers window, it will roll back down to 3/4 up 90% of the time.

Is this a safety feature for arms or stuff stuck in the window path when the auto up is triggered, and my window somehow thinks there is an obstruction? (there is no obstruction that I can see)

Is there any way to turn this off? (eg cut some of the wires?)

I have attempted to search this issue with no success.

Thanks in advance

Josh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/427762-r34-auto-window-switch-roll-down/
Share on other sites

I would be checking the action of the mechanism, and spraying some dry lube on the tracks to fix it. I doubt its as simple as a wire snip to fix it, because it relies on sensing excess current going to the motor.

I have the same issue.

I opened up the driver side door and looked inside the window cavity and noticed that my window is not rolling up straight. When i try to open my window using the auto feature when the door is open, the window goes crazy since there is no frame, and it opens all weird like it's going to fall out :\

I've noticed the rubber around my driver side door where the window hits is worn out too, and at one time was falling off. I kind of just pushed it back on.

I don't use the auto 'full up' switch anymore... but when i want to roll it up fully, i have to SLIDE the window back towards the rear of the car, then roll it up.

Yes, my window SLIDES :\

Not sure if this is the same issue as you, but if it's not, sorry to hijack the thread lol.

#@suwidji

Turns out that what you said about the window coming up in an angle was EXACTLY the issue. I pulled / lifted my window and it has massive play up/down on one side, like its not bolted down to the rail. 20mm movement on one side so I assume this is the only problem.

Thanks!

#@suwidji

Turns out that what you said about the window coming up in an angle was EXACTLY the issue. I pulled / lifted my window and it has massive play up/down on one side, like its not bolted down to the rail. 20mm movement on one side so I assume this is the only problem.

Thanks!

glad you know what's wrong with it!

Do you by any chance know how to fix it? Or who to go to, to get it fixed?? I've been dealing with this problem for a while and it's kind of embarassing when i want to roll up my window, because I have to slide the window back haha.

haven't had time to pull off the door card and fix it. I assume the vibration caused the bolts to loosen, this has happened before in my crapshack S chassis cars.

I'll take a photo when it's all done and fixed to give you an idea what it all looks like. should be simple.

thanks again for the idea

Just an update,

I took my door card apart and found this at the bottom!

20130705_193044_zps48f3aa2c.jpg

There's also a small hole in the bottom right corner of the window where i believe this part fits in. BUT I think there's more to this part than just putting it back in. Should there be a guide that slots into the guide rail inside? There is one on the left side of the window, So i'm just assuming it should be the same for the right. These are the only 2 parts I could find inside the actual door card though, so either the rest is lost, or can someone tell me how to put this back on??

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, just an update.

I found the tracking mechanism was still inside the guide rail, but at the very bottom, So i didnt even realise on first inspection.

When i found it, i placed the 2 window guides back on (those 2 circle things i posted earlier), and it worked fine again and my window stopped sliding around!!! :D

BUT then today, the bloody window went nuts. I wound the window all the way down and back up to see if it was a 1-time thing... to notice my bloody tinting was scratched off!!!! I was NOT happy :rant:

Got home, took the door card apart and found out the guides had fallen off and the screw that held them in was scraping against the window (which caused the tint to rip off!!!)

I then realised i put the guides on wrong. The one with the thread should have gone on the side of the window closest to the outer panel of the car, not the one closest to the inside cabin of the car.

Now i need a new tint :down:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...