Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Iv blown the bottom end in my r32 GTR and don't no witch way to go about it, I'm sorta on a tight budget due to jus buying a house, if I should go with a rb30/26 bottom end or just buy a new motor iv had the car for a while but jus sits in the garage 2nd drive I went for 8months after buying the car bang bottom end gone. :(

Havnt had a chance to dyno it or nothing.

Following mods are

Intank walbro 500hp fuel pump

850cc injectors pretty sure

Full 3/half inch exhaust wid aftermarket dumps

-5 turbos

Any one know ruffley what power it would push wid a stock motor and the following mods including a ecu plus a good tune.

& if I was to go rb30 bottom end forged, what adjustments ect I would have to do.

Thanks post-133383-13942935135466_thumb.jpgpost-133383-13942935281152_thumb.jpgpost-133383-13942935621347_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440245-general-question/
Share on other sites

If your tight, stay 26 bottom end.

Its not exactly simple to fit a 30 in a r32 shell, block sits higher and bonnet closing issues where the turbo badge is on the pipe.

By the time you factor in the adapter plate, welding the rear sump bolt holes, redrilling them, new pickup pipe, some small mods to the block like your knock sensors bolt holes and clearancing for the adapter plate, piping or joiners to reach a bit higher and the fact that its not legal, stay with the 26.

If you spun a bearing, just get another crank with the long nose, some rods and pistons and your done, or just get a second hand working engine from a 33/34 (long nose crank drive) and just keep driving, your old engine being sold should cover the engine swap costs if your paying someone to do it for you.

Edited by GTRPSI

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...