Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Q: 2.5" cat-back vs. 3" cat-back... is the 3" any better? or do i get the 2.5" ??

when the tax return comes in, i will be in the market for a new cat-back exhaust...

currently i have a 3" dump/front on the standard r32 turbo, and have the stock cat-back into a 2.5" straight through muffler... won't ever be running more than 13 or 14psi through my FMIC (and with gtr cams this week!)

so brings me back to the question: do i go 2.5" cat-back or 3" cat-back?

for the exhaust flow i require will a 2.5" cat-back be sufficient? i have read articles of sr20's and other 2L engines making good power with a 2.5" exhaust so would 3" just bo overkill with unnecessary cabin resonance?

or will the extra diameter of the 3" over 2.5" make a big difference?

if i choose the 2.5" i can just change the pipe and leave my current muffler and that will save on money a bit...

what do you think?

remember its hanging off an rb20 not an rb25 so exhaust flow will be less.

cheers,

Waz.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/
Share on other sites

Depends what sort of power u are making with the 2.5".

Bonest stock my R32 made 115rwkw, stock everything.

I then had a fmic, bosh910 external pump, 3" turbo back exhaust with resonator and muffler fitted up, not all at once but near enough.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 12.5psi (stock IC) it was making 152rwkw.

With the stock fueling (rich due to external pump) and 15psi (FMIC) the car made 155rwkw.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 15psi (FMIC) it was making 164rwkw on a 30degree day.

I know dyno's are only tuning tool but it gives you a rough idea.

With the car running 12.5psi of boost and making 152rwkw it would accelerate as quick as a bone stock R33 GTR, we went on a few cruises also managed to grab a vid of one of the runs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-905603
Share on other sites

my RB20 runs a 3" dump/front pipe, cat and 3" Trust Power Extreme II exhaust

nice sound outside, quiet inside the cabin, actually improved the torque in the midrange significantly back when my car was stock and helped the responsiveness overall. a simple ECU remap improved that further. Now significantly modified, but exhaust is still good - if I had a 2.5" I would've needed to spend more $$ to get it changed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906455
Share on other sites

It all depends what your final goals are.

I wish I didn't waste the $1650 this exhaust cost me around 2 years ago.

I went for a custom system as I didn't like the big arsed milo-tin look.

Its a nice sounding exhaust, not muffled so you can hear the nice purr when cruising along, doesn't get the cabin boom.

A WOT it is louder than most jap exhausts but it isn't loud enough to be annoying.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906523
Share on other sites

hmmm so the 3" sounds like a clear winner here...

what about going a custom exhaust (3" mandrel with cannon muffler and resonator - $450) versus a jap second hand exhaust (same specs) for about 500 probably

will there be any differences in cabin resonance? will i get a quieter sound from a trusty jap exhaust?

the exhaust shop that quoted me 450 also said that they make the exhaust sit higher than stock so it is not the lowest part of the car and makes it easier to lower the car later if i want :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906607
Share on other sites

Be carefull what mufflers that custom exhaust place is using, for a good quality cat back exhaust the cheapest I have been quoted is around $600, mild steel.

For a full turbo back exhaust inc. cat I was quoted around $1100 for mild steel.

Stainless jumps the price up to around $1500-1600.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907026
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it? well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive. I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems. The big problem is finding the balance. If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort? How much noise can you handle? I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do. Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end. Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907287
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it?  well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive.  I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems.  The big problem is finding the balance.   If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort?  How much noise can you handle?  I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do.  Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end.  Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

thanks mate, as always a thorough response.

my gtr cams went in today so the exhaust really has to go soon so i can get those exhaust gasses out quickly!

2 questions:

- how low does the super dragger hang?

- cannon mufflers: are they any better/worse for flow/noise than a larger muffler? (assuming they are both 3" straight through)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907459
Share on other sites

The super dragger seems to hang about as low as other cat back systems I had fitted, but the rear muffler is pretty fat and sits a bit lower than the others.

As for muffler type, I really think it comes back to design again. The design of the through pipe, what sort of material is being used and size/length would all have an impact. Bit of a black art to me - thats why I just went with swap a few until I found a good one. I even tried an N1 style that was louder than a straight 90mm pipe!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909295
Share on other sites

I recently upgraded my 2.5" system which was starting to rattle and sound dodgy. Picked up a second hand 3" HKS Super Drager system which was in pretty decent nick (bar a few scratches and scrapes from speedbumps) for $350 and got it fitted. I mainly expected an improvement in sound, but the car feels so much nicer to drive now, with better midrange.

I think it cost me about $450 all up after fitting. Bargain!

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909387
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...