Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As for steering geometry the effect of spacers is exactly the same as getting the "right" offset with no spacers.

The correct offset is more than having the wheels flush. Its about where a line drawn through the center of the tyre would intersect with a lne drawn though the centre of the ball joints. Moving the tyre inboard or outboard without using the correct offset moves that intercection point further apart ot closer together, further changing the scrub radius. Using a spacer will not correct the incorrect offset UNLESS it brings the incorrect offset being used closer to the original scrub radius.

The pulling affect is called bump steer.

would the scrub radius be pacified by adjusting the camber angle ?

not necessarily the standard camber setting !! , but a re-calculated angle to account for the offset change / or indeed lowering of the vehicle - different size tyres are said to contribute to the scrub effect .

I now run 25mm spacers on the front of my RSV4 S1 ET43 8.5" - and it was the best thing i did so far .....

Cured my horrible understeer .. and improved the look

I have adjustable suspension all round and I am low , BUT running standard caster / camber / toe in/out measurements .

However on uneven roads it dose tend to wander off .

So now i am wondering If another angle for the caster , other than standard , is worth a try ( $130 bucks a shot in UK !! ) this i would think may also include toe angle ? and may help with the original questions issue

Well i spent hours taking the spacers off yesterday as the previous owner must have used locktite to put the nuts on.

Drove it this morning with no spacers and it still pulled when on uneven roads, spoken to the located mechanic and he is going to ave a look next week, i need new tyres anyway so gonna get new tryes and a wheel alignment saturday and go from there, eveeryhitng under the car seems ok, but im not a mechanic so im not 100% sure, i have new sway bar links and sway bar and sway bar rubbers but bushings etc at 150k old so could be anything. least i know its not the spcaers, and i can put them back on and try a few other things i guess

The correct offset is more than having the wheels flush. Its about where a line drawn through the center of the tyre would intersect with a lne drawn though the centre of the ball joints. Moving the tyre inboard or outboard without using the correct offset moves that intercection point further apart ot closer together, further changing the scrub radius. Using a spacer will not correct the incorrect offset UNLESS it brings the incorrect offset being used closer to the original scrub radius.

The amount of offset is irrelevant. The act of moving the wheel (and tyre) out from the original, stock position changes the geometry and while it may be done mainly for appearance it also has the effect of increasing the track. Whether this is achieved by wheels with a different offset or with spacers the result is exactly the same. In my experience this change has no bad effect on steering or handling. In Ted's case he reports an improvement in that he has reduced understeer.

would the scrub radius be pacified by adjusting the camber angle ?

I have adjustable suspension all round and I am low , BUT running standard caster / camber / toe in/out measurements .

However on uneven roads it dose tend to wander off .

So now i am wondering If another angle for the caster , other than standard , is worth a try ( $130 bucks a shot in UK !! ) this i would think may also include toe angle ? and may help with the original questions issue

Yes a little negative camber (1 to 1.5 deg for the street or rather more... 3 deg for the track) will help. More castor (6 -7 deg ) will help with straight line stability particularly at speed. You will need adjustable castor arms to achieve the latter but you can achieve a small increase in negative camber with adjustable bushes. In either case you will then have to correct toe-in.

  • Like 1

So i was lucky enough to get my mechanic to ahve a look at my car today, Jon from Driven Motorsport in SA is amazing and knows his stuff and highly reccomend them to anyone in SA.

As i said in previous post spacers, didnt seem to be the issue.

Mechanic did a full check front and back, seems that previous owner cut the rear springs so rear is very soft, the rear sub frame bushes in the rear, are fine, but not the best and have a bit of movement, and could do with replacing.

so after getting new tyres this week will see how it goes =)

Well I have had our Stagea for 6 years now and bought the car with Tein suspension , Rays Volts 18x8 + 32 with 235x40`s , 25mm spacers all around , 1 1/4 degrees camber front and back , lowered 40mm as well and have no issues . However it depends on many variables and in the end , who sets up the suspension.

Edited by coparts41

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...