Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After having the infamous ring land failure on the stock bottom end I have decided to go with new pistons and rods for this season , The car will be running Wiseco 86.5 pistons and I would like to know what kind of P2W (piston to wall) clearance you guys are using. I know the 0.0025 Wiseco recommends is way to tight for a high boost application with pump gas. I have already talked to Wiseco and have a ball park Idea on what i want to run but I would like to have information from the builders as to what you guys are running.

Wiseco 86.5 : K578M865AP

Brian Crower rods

running 2 bars on 94 Octane

supporting mods

Thanks for reading and please inform me if you want any other info on the build

Edited by drpheel

I have those exact pistons in my 2630 and we tightened them up to 2 thou, car has seen 28psi on E85 but at 30psi it miss fired due to backpressure from the turbos :(

Motor has been running since Feb last year, cold dry comp tested two weeks ago and all 6 were within 5 psi of each other

I have those exact pistons in my 2630 and we tightened them up to 2 thou, car has seen 28psi on E85 but at 30psi it miss fired due to backpressure from the turbos :(

Motor has been running since Feb last year, cold dry comp tested two weeks ago and all 6 were within 5 psi of each other

Wow! running them 0.0020 instead of the recomended 0.0025? i know Wiseco says the coating will wear down about 0.0005 but maybe the fact that you are using E85 and not seeing the same combustion temperature as a pump gas engine at the same power level

Thanks for your input, I will take note of this information

Not sure what alloy Wiseco use but most pistons are about 4 thou.

Wiseco uses 2618

2618 alloy , low silicone. This makes the piston more malleable and causes them to deform rather than shatter under extreme pressures. therefore the piston will expand more under heat = more p2w clearance they will have about 15% greater tensile strength and about 10% greater fatigue endurance then 4032. High HP application usual put the p2w clearance loose to prevent the piston from sticking to the cyl wall if any unwanted expansion occurred and sacrifice a little blow-by on idle until they warm up and eventual wear of the cyl wall over time.
4032 alloy, high silicone will have less expansion, low p2w clearance but when they go out .... they BLOW out. they will more likely shows less sing of wear in the cyl over the long run then 2618 because they will be very little difference in size at operating temperature letting the builder use a tighter P2w clearance. so less slap in the cyl when getting up to operating temp and less wear on the cyl walls.
Funny quote from the Honda guys forum ; Build it loose, only you will know OR build it tight and EVERYONE will know :laugh:

Wiseco uses 2618

Funny quote from the Honda guys forum ; Build it loose, only you will know OR build it tight and EVERYONE will know :laugh:

Well 4 thou is pretty normal for 2618.

Actually you build it loose and everyone will know - because it will rattle like a b!tch on start up. Dont have any noise out of mine with 4 thou but it might get a bit colder where you live.

Just for interests sake:

http://www.jepistons.com/PDFs/TechCorner/SCPDrawings/piston_instrc2618.pdf

Compared to

http://www.jepistons.com/PDFs/TechCorner/SCPDrawings/piston_instrc4032.pdf

And for other, old school stuff - the clearance is 5 thou.

http://www.aclperformance.com.au/NissanRB26DETTForgedPistons.htm

Anyway if you check the JE docs carefully it recommends more clearance for turbo motors for obvious reasons.

Well 4 thou is pretty normal for 2618.

Actually you build it loose and everyone will know - because it will rattle like a b!tch on start up. Dont have any noise out of mine with 4 thou but it might get a bit colder where you live.

Just for interests sake:

http://www.jepistons.com/PDFs/TechCorner/SCPDrawings/piston_instrc2618.pdf

Compared to

http://www.jepistons.com/PDFs/TechCorner/SCPDrawings/piston_instrc4032.pdf

And for other, old school stuff - the clearance is 5 thou.

http://www.aclperformance.com.au/NissanRB26DETTForgedPistons.htm

Anyway if you check the JE docs carefully it recommends more clearance for turbo motors for obvious reasons.

Great info ! thanks again I will have to call wiseco back because i know the coating they have on the pistion skirts goes down about 0.0005 when it wears out so il have to take that in consideration to. altho this is what Wiseco says about the coating on the webpage :

Some of our forged pistons offer our new ArmorGlide™ skirt coating, which is the result of testing, development, and benchmarking through Wiseco’s rigorous in-house dyno program. The outcome is the ultimate in skirt coating toughness, lubrication, and bond technology working together to minimize friction, maximize horsepower, and provide improved wear resistance. Not only is ArmorGlide™ a high-tech lubricant that reduces friction, but it also allows the piston to be fitted tighter within the bore allowing a better ring seal and reduced noise from piston rock.

Not sure if that is done for the initial seal /break in for the rings and eventually wears out to give a little more clearance when pushing it harder. Il get on the phone with Wiseco ( if i get the line ) and report back my findings !

Thanks again for your input #@djr81

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...