Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,
I have this 1990 Holden Rodeo with a 1JZ in it (don't h8). The dream is to build a custom rear chassis with mount points to allow a complete Nissan IRS to be bolted in under it, then go coilovers all round.
Here's the plan I drew up:

tjb9.jpg

I want this to be engineered and daily driveable in Queensland, which means asking DOT if I can reduce the load rating on my Rodeo from 1 tonne to something closer to what a Nissan IRS can handle. I was originally planning to go for an IRS out of an S14, but then I remembered C34 Stageas run a very similar rear end, right? And if it told DOT that I was sourcing my IRS from a wagon with a 1500kg towing capacity, it would look better than saying I pulled the rear end off a tiny little sports coupe.

So what I would be super grateful if any of you could supply is:
- Any photos you have of your Stagea IRS,

- Underbody shots

- Any info on spring rates etc

- And if someone could get me the part off the tyre placard with the recommended load rating on the rear tyres, that would be a bonus.

Thanks heaps for your time.

Cheers,

Archie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445109-stagea-irs-into-a-holden-rodeo-yeah/
Share on other sites

This is obviously a mock up and you could not rego this

06042010007.jpg

You'd be better off with a notch, 4link and coilovers. the idea of an irs rear is great, but the amount of hurdle jumping you will need to do will be incredible. The guy who built that ^ has got great skills, but even he scrapped it and went full tubular. Not judging you on your skill level, obviously i don't know. But maybe give a few engineers a call and show them your cad etc drawings to see if you should or can continue further.

Thanks for your interest Stagea97, do you know what the IRS in your photo is from?
I've looked into more traditional setups, but I've been talking to an engineer for the last few months, and he believes it's 100% doable from his perspective.
The only major legal hurdle we can see is the fact that Queensland Transport doesn't like to reduce GVMs on light commercials as too many people did it just so they could run big wheels.
I think I have a chance at an exemption because I only use my Rodeo as a daily, and the only thing it ever really carrys is my 100kg electric wheelchair (I have a crane that lifts it into the tray). I will be asking for an exemption based on the fact that an IRS conversion, whilst complex and expensive, is the best way to get my Rodeo to sit low (so I can transfer from my chair) whilst giving the best possible ride and handling qualities. I have Occupational therapists and engineers willing to back me on the practicality.

All I need is some info on Stagea load ratings, and some photos of your IRS's. Then I can start writing up my submission.

What about an irs ass end from a commodore ute? Better weight carrying capacity and much more readily available info.

There are some excellent photo's in a number of the threads in the stages and skyline project sections.

... stages tire placard may not mean much to an Australian government (they don't like imports) agency.

Cheers

J.

I could get you demensions of the M35 subframe as I have a few here, but it is all alloy and as far as I know not 'load rated'. Many people have fitted 1500kg tow bars to the rear intrusion bar threads and they seem capable enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...