Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bumping an old thread... But I just did this today to pass the weekend. The smaller pipe is normally hidden so I started on that for practice by the larger pipe I got the idea. I found it easier and neater to wrap around then snip and then over lap it with the next strip; just make sure you make the snip on the part that is not visible easily and it'll look nice. Used almost all 10m's of it.

Also, I noticed if you angle away from a bend to begin with and by the end of it'll be facing the other direction. That info helped me get it looking a little neater/even by the end of it.

i.e: if the bend is an:

L

Then if you're starting from the horizontal part, start the strip like this:

\

and once it wraps around it'll be in this direction:

/

I'm also painting them black to stop it from standing out so much it holds paint quite well, I was almost tempted not to because it does look pretty damn cool - like something off a space craft :). The paint isn't completely done yet, I'm going to smooth it out a bit and re coat it tomorrow for a nicer finish.

I left the bend out of the intercooler untouched as you can see it through the black mesh of the type m front bar which looks quite nice.

Pics below:

Before:

SDC12140.jpg

After:

SDC12143.jpg

Paint:

SDC12146.jpg

SDC12149.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :(

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :)

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

  • 4 months later...
i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

this is what i intially thought, it would be great if someone could give some actual before and after air temps, ie, temperatures of the air that is just about to flow into the throttle body with and without the shielding. :)

  • 2 months later...

when i did this, only on crossover pipe... i covered it with duct tape first, to make it a little easier if i ever want to remove the flashtac, however mine has started to melt the tar on the bend of the pipe... fyi :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Depending on how long the car sat it is very possible for injectors to be stuck open or closed, I'd get them cleaned and flow tested. Other than that, obviously when the loom changes and the car doesn't start any more....the loom is suspect so some tracing / comparing may be required
    • Harness is for a s1 Rb25det, and it is engine and lower harness.  the old harness had broken off plugs and was in very rough condition/exposed wires and splices etc. it is not able to be put back on the car, I could visually inspect to see if they had rewired any pins on the ecu plug. The fuel pump definitly isn’t turning off it’s an external pump and very loud you can hear it. Will look at the other harness tonight, am also going to pull the fuel rail and watch the injectors spray, will update here with what I find. Pretty sure at this point it has to be something to do with injectors because car will fire up on starting fluid and cas is clicking the Injectors. Fuel pressure is steady 43psi 
    • Check the injectors flow evenly, and are actually flowing what you and the ECU think they should be flowing. If it's starting up on starter fluid, you have a fuel issue. Is it possible under cranking your fuel pump is turning off?   The harness you replaced, is that the whole engine harness? Do yourself a test, and drop the old harness on and plug it into the Z32 ECU. It's possible they've wired things different. From memory S1 to S2 is different in RB25 and you may have a wrong loom
    • I haven’t pulled the injectors to watch them spray yet but they are clicking from the cas and all of the spark plugs are wet with fuel. I’ve thought the cylinders were being flooded from the beginning and was hoping fuel pressure would fix it. Tonight I am going to pull the rail and watch the injectors spray. Don’t know how to test/diagnose if the plugs are firing in correct sequence but that should be a timing thing and as far as timing goes my car still has the half moon for the cas can only install it 1 way. And my mechanical timing is 100% correct I posted photos above. Confirmed with the balancer on and off. 
×
×
  • Create New...