Jump to content
SAU Community

Thermal shield for FMIC pipes


GTRgeoff
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bumping an old thread... But I just did this today to pass the weekend. The smaller pipe is normally hidden so I started on that for practice by the larger pipe I got the idea. I found it easier and neater to wrap around then snip and then over lap it with the next strip; just make sure you make the snip on the part that is not visible easily and it'll look nice. Used almost all 10m's of it.

Also, I noticed if you angle away from a bend to begin with and by the end of it'll be facing the other direction. That info helped me get it looking a little neater/even by the end of it.

i.e: if the bend is an:

L

Then if you're starting from the horizontal part, start the strip like this:

\

and once it wraps around it'll be in this direction:

/

I'm also painting them black to stop it from standing out so much it holds paint quite well, I was almost tempted not to because it does look pretty damn cool - like something off a space craft :). The paint isn't completely done yet, I'm going to smooth it out a bit and re coat it tomorrow for a nicer finish.

I left the bend out of the intercooler untouched as you can see it through the black mesh of the type m front bar which looks quite nice.

Pics below:

Before:

SDC12140.jpg

After:

SDC12143.jpg

Paint:

SDC12146.jpg

SDC12149.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any numbers in regards to this stuff yet? The OP menitoned he's of the datalogger type, but hasn't posted anything about actual temps.

I have 2 theories:

One results in a cooler charge.

One results in a hotter charge.

I wouldn't mind looking at this modification further myself, I assume the tar is hard to remove after installation, therefore I'll have to wait. :)

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I don't have numbers, I've noticed after doing this I swear I can feel a noticeable temperature change from the start of the unshielded crossover pipe, to the throttle body and from the throttle body to the manifold. Obviously this means a considerably lower temperature in the pipes. I do really want to bypass the coolant feed to the throttle body too.

I got a small thermocouple I can use to measure the temperatures I'll do it when I can, I have an exam in 12 days I have to study for now though.

Out of curiosity, what is your theory resulting in a hotter charge?

EDIT: BTW for those who are interested the pipes look pretty good now they're installed, you can see the pics in my garage.

i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
i think you will find that while the pipe is cooler, the amount of temperature difference in the actual air temp is minimal. the reason being that the air is flowing through that pipe at such a speed that the relatively small surface area of metal won't be having much of an effect on the large amount of air. now i'm not saying it wouldn't have any effect on the air temp, but nowhere near as much as is thought by some people. the air is flowing through that pipe in relatively short time, and there is a large volume of it. the principle is the same as how you can touch something hot very fast and not feel the heat, but if you touch it for a longer period of time you will.

this is what i intially thought, it would be great if someone could give some actual before and after air temps, ie, temperatures of the air that is just about to flow into the throttle body with and without the shielding. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...