Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got some left over servicing goods to clear. These were purchased previously to go on a 180SX SR20DET (non-vtc blacktop), however don't have the car anymore. Note that most will also suit other cars like the oils and coolant. I'm sure for those interested will already know if it'll suit their car or not. Also check the part numbers and pictures below to be sure!

ALL BRAND NEW UNOPENED!

1. 1x KAAZ Powertrain Gear Oil (diff) GL-5/80w90 2L
$60 picked up (retails for >$100)

2. 1x Motul Gear 300 75W90 Gearbox Oil 1L
$20 picked up (bought at Autobarn for $44.99)

3. 4x Motul Inugel Expert Ultra Coolant 1L
$40 picked up (bought at Autobarn for $59.96)

4. 2x Z32 Nissan Fuel Filter (16400-Q0805)
4. 2x Nissan Oil Filter (15208-53J0A)
4. 1x GReddy Oil Filter (OX-01)
4. 4x NGK BKR6E Spark Plugs
$50 picked up or Express Posted for the lot

Locate for pick up is Burwood East, VIC. Not keen to post the oils and coolant given the weight I can't send via Express Post (free), unless you want to cover postage costs yourself.

Contact via pm or sms on zero four two one 1 2 1 eight one eight.

Cheers,

Andy

post-25413-0-29717300-1426493096_thumb.jpg

post-25413-0-94729700-1426493098_thumb.jpg

4. 2x Z32 Nissan Fuel Filter (16400-Q0805)
4. 2x Nissan Oil Filter (15208-53J0A)
4. 1x GReddy Oil Filter (OX-01)
4. 4x NGK BKR6E Spark Plugs
$50 picked up or Express Posted for the lot SOLD!!!

1. 1x KAAZ Powertrain Gear Oil (diff) GL-5/80w90 2L
$60 picked up (retails for >$100) SOLD!!!

Also note guys, I am able to send the oils and coolant via Express Post. I was worried that I wasn't able to send due to being dangerous goods, but I checked the AusPost site and couldn't find anywhere it stating that these are dangerous goods. Also thought that they'll be too heavy, but they all weigh <5kg so no problem using 3kg or 5kg Express Post satchels.

So will send these via Express Post at no additional charge... Happy days :D

Cheers,

Andy

Bump!

Also forgot to post this up as well...

5. Martini SintEco 40 (10w40) Engine Oil 5L

$30 picked up (Bought at Martini Racing Products - H/O for $55, which now retails for $60)

sinteco_40_online_store.jpg

Cheers,

Andy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Just an update all...

Was looking at selling the oil on the weekend, only to realise when taking it out that the oil is actually opened :(

I didn't recall opening this oil, but the seal is broken. Bottle appears to be full still so I have a feeling that I opened it up mistakenly when I had another opened bottle already to use.

Anyway, I want to move everything asap so looking to sell as follows...

2. 1x Motul Gear 300 75W90 Gearbox Oil 1L (unopened)

3. 4x Motul Inugel Expert Ultra Coolant 1L (unopened)

5. Martini SintEco 40 (10w40) Engine Oil 5L (opened)

Give me $50 and take the lot!

Cheers,

Andy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...