Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is always plenty of people who make mention of either being issued with a defect notice or having concernes of whether or not specific modifications will pass inspections. Does anyone know if there is a link to the Department of Transport (I'm talking QLD here - but no doubt those in other states would like to know their own) website which provides a full listing of what is considered legal in terms of a car - ie transport department specifications which their inspections are based upon.

Apart from obviously conforming to those specifications, we would all be better armed with the knowledge to defend any potential challenge to our interpretation of the rules.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45946-avoiding-defect-notices/
Share on other sites

DOTARS do a ADRs CD but charge $70, ive stumbled across a good link that i'll post up as a thread. The ADRs are federal and each state has a few laws of there own, however you'd be surprised about how much information going around is wrong. Cops normally don't know, and a lot of the times the guys at the pits dont know either.

Anyway try this link it has a few of the ADRs:

http://www.ajc13b.com/main.htm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...