Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i had a post cat sensor on bank 2 giving very slow readings compared to bank 1. Had both replaced and no changes. Except now i have a bank 2 intake error code P0021 as well. Are they linked? Why has the new sensor not worked? Help please. Next step is to check the intake solenoid resistance and cleanliness. But what if the narrow band sensor?

Was the O2 sensors triggering a CEL? If not, there probably wasn't anything wrong, all they do is confirm the cat is working. Only the pre-cat WB sensors are used for fuel mix management. Also, each bank is managed separately, so there is no reason to assume the output of each bank's O2 sensors will be in sync, you are better off comparing each bank's WB sensors with the O2 sensor from the same side.

I can't see how the P0021 error could be related to an O2 sensor, but perhaps something was disturbed or not re-connected when the O2 sensors were replaced.

No CEL before or after. I know how they are supposed to work and I understand they are independent. What I meant was that they vary like the pre-cat ones but should still vary from 0-1V continuously, not stay in one spot as bank 2 is doing. If you look at this graph you can see bank 2 is not working properly. After the new sensors I'm still getting the same reading. So perhaps something else is wrong back towards the engine, or a problem with the connection between the sensor and ECU?

you didn't attach any graph.. If they are just responding slow, then chances are it isn't a bad connection between the sensor and the ECU. If you can attach the graph you spoke of, perhaps it will make it clearer to understand what you are describing.

This morning it thre both P0011 and P0021. So I checked the solenoids according tot he workshop manual and could not produce the DTC's. The colenoids look clean and are at correct resistance. I did check for loose bolts whilst under the hood and the intake clamps on B2 were quite loose at the TB. I've set up the data scan for a more suitable set of co-ords then I'll go for a run. No codes when revving stationary at running temps. Must only happen under load.

I've attached the graph you requested and a few more. Haven't got the error since tightening the TB pipe and cleaning the air filters. Coincidence? Bank 2 post cat still looks strange to me. For some reason when converting the graphs to JPG they cut the edges off.

Exhaust sensors bank 2 only

Dark blue WB B2

Light blue NB B2

20151231%20Exhaust%20Sensors%20Bank%202%

All exhaust sensors

Yellow NB B1

Light blue NB B2

Green WB B1

Dark blue WB B2

20151231%20Exhaust%20Sensors_zps9zvuwziy

Post cat sensors bank 1 vs 2

Yellow NB B1

Blue NB B2

20151231%20Exhaust%20Sensors%20Post%20Ca

Edited by 30ONA

It is a bit hard to say for sure, but it looks like the B2 WB is also reading higher than the B1 WB? which may mean B2 is running lean, thus the consistently high voltage from the B2 NB sensor.

Could possibly be a airleak in B2 intake, or a bad MAF? if you don't have any luck finding any intake leaks, perhaps try swapping MAFs over and see if the fault appears on B1. Might be worth doing a long term fuel trim reset if you do that too.

It is a bit hard to say for sure, but it looks like the B2 WB is also reading higher than the B1 WB? which may mean B2 is running lean, thus the consistently high voltage from the B2 NB sensor.

Could possibly be a airleak in B2 intake, or a bad MAF? if you don't have any luck finding any intake leaks, perhaps try swapping MAFs over and see if the fault appears on B1. Might be worth doing a long term fuel trim reset if you do that too.

Yes B2 WB is higher. If I pressurise the intake to look for leaks wat is a safe pressure? 10psi?

I read somewhere once that disconnecting the MAF resulted in a trip to Nissan to fix/reset. I can't remember why.

I can't see why, unless you try to start the car with the MAF disconnected, but even that should just store a code in the ECU and trigger the CEL, which you should be able to clear without needing a trip to a nissan dealer. But I don't have a VQ35HR powered car, so I can't speak from experience.

I also can't see 10psi causing issues with the intake, but maybe start with less than that and see if you can find anything.

Here is the two MAF sensors compared. B2 reading slightly lower all of the time. Does lower voltage equates to more or less air/fuel? I've going to swap the MAF sensors and see if all the readings swap over to B1. These online conversion programs do weird things to the pdf file.

20160102%20MAF%20b1%20vs%20MAF%20b2_zpsn

Edited by 30ONA

I'm not sure what the output of the MAF sensor represents, maybe just experiment while watching the live output of the MAF while you get on and off the throttle.

I'm not sure what the output of the MAF sensor represents, maybe just experiment while watching the live output of the MAF while you get on and off the throttle.

Just realised I can't swap them as the B1 sensor has the intake temperature sensor and the ECU won't know what temps to use if the harness only reads from the B1 side.

I really don't know where to go now but I still don't have any codes since cleaning the air filters and tightening the intake pipes. I might leave it alone now.

Sorry, I am not sure there is too much more I can add. I would expect that each bank would be drawing the same amount of air if all things are equal, but in the real world, one bank could have a clogged filter, or a dirty throttle body which will show up as a difference in airflow. It is a bit hard to say if this is the cause of the problem.

Sorry, I am not sure there is too much more I can add. I would expect that each bank would be drawing the same amount of air if all things are equal, but in the real world, one bank could have a clogged filter, or a dirty throttle body which will show up as a difference in airflow. It is a bit hard to say if this is the cause of the problem.

I've cleaned the air filters and TB's before taking these readings.

  • 11 months later...

Intake error codes P0021 & P0022 fixed. Turned out to be a failed oil gallery gasket in the front of the motor. Apparently quite common between 80k-120k miles. Mine was at the upper end of the expected failure time. Gasket $12, Labour and parts for timing kit, $5000.

Basically when the gallery fails the oil pressure plays up blowing oil past the gasket into the timing chain cover. This impacts on the intake and exhaust valve solenoid that are triggered with oil pressure. They chatter because the oil pressure can't be maintained properly.

 

I hope this helps someone in the future with diagnostic as this one had a few people stumped. I found the answer on g35 driver.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
    • You can set hard reserves on your battery system, and it can't be discharged past that.  
    • That sounds like an excellent idea. But total self-sufficiency means exactly that. You have no-one else to blame when your system faults out and you have no power for a week or two while it gets fixed. You'd have to go the whole hog and get a diesel genny and all the switchover gear, to get you through such times. And, despite the fact that over 20 years, my system has been pretty reliable**, I have seen so many inverter explosions (or less dramatic deaths), panel and roof JB fires, and so on, over that time, to know that the stuff is the same as any other bulk Chinese manufactured stuff. The failure rate is well above zero - both on the equipment and on behalf of the meth addled installation labour force. And then..... warranty and means of redress against the supplier you bought the gear from. Best I can tell is that only a handful of solar companies are still around within 5 years of starting their advertising pitch. They disappear and phoenix like crazy. So, as per 1st paragraph, I suspect the only way to is go balls deep and spend maybe 2-3 times as much as you might think, so that you have every base covered. Plus, know and understand your gear intimately, so you can diagnose problems, sort them out yourself, etc, etc. Plus, probably have to consider upgrading various parts as the years pass, to maintain compatibility with newer stuff, performance and reliability, etc, etc. Whereas, remaining attached to the grid has an ongoing cost that keeps going up even if you use bugger all power from it. But it does provide the fallback in case of the worst case with your own gear. You either pay up front or as you go, I suspect.
×
×
  • Create New...